« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Loony Nancy shows contempt for and hatred of the Constitutional right of religious freedom ... 

By: capt_nemo in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (2)
Wed, 04 Jul 18 9:54 AM | 265 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 21761 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 21756 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Fancy is one brain dead batch!!!!!!!!!!!!




Avatar

Realist - Everybody in America is soft, and hates conflict. The cure for this, both in politics and social life, is the same -- hardihood. Give them raw truth.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Loony Nancy shows contempt for and hatred of the Constitutional right of religious freedom ...
By: Beldin
in CONSTITUTION
Tue, 05 Jun 18 10:58 PM
Msg. 21756 of 21975

... while extolling the "virtues" of homosexual behavior that is NOT a right under The Constitution. 

Nancy Pelosi on Supreme Court Ruling: Bake That Cake, Christians!

http://www.breitbart.com/california/2018/06/04/nancy-pelosi-on-supreme-court-ruling-bake-that-cake-christians/

"The Masterpiece Cakeshop case is about the most fundamental right of all Americans: to be free from persecution and discrimination because of who they are or whom they love." ~ Nancy "I Wish I Had A Brain" Pelosi

Sorry, Nancy dear ... but, as per usual, you are woefully confused. Of course, this stems from the undeniable FACT that you and your fellow Dimocrats simply do not understand The Constitution. The Constitution was created to uphold the rights of individual citizens against the government and to restrain the government from seeking revenge against its citizens for enjoying their inalienable rights. The original negotiation for potential cake-making services between the Colorado baker and the homosexual couple did NOT involve the government - PERIOD. The government unconstitutionally inserted itself, after the fact, to ostensibly punish the baker for the exercise of his inalienable First Amendment right. The baker did NOT "persecute" or "discriminate against" anyone's Constitutional rights ... his refusal of custom cake-making services had nothing to do with anyone's inalienable rights under The Constitution. He simply and properly exercised his right to freedom of religious beliefs by not participating in supporting behavior that he believes is abnormal and wrong. This homosexual couple does not have the right to condemn, subvert, and control the baker's religious beliefs - and neither does the government - SO SAYS THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. The baker did not refuse to sell them any ready-made products in his shop. They wanted a cake ... if the shop did not have a ready-made cake to their liking and the baker did not wish to participate in supporting their abnormal behavior by customizing one, fine ... the couple should have ventured on down the street to the next available bakery.

One wonders what the reception would have been if the next bakery was owned and run by a Muslim, eh? But, of course, this couple wouldn't have sued a Muslim baker refusing them service. No ... because this LGBTQ stupidity had nothing whatsoever to do with any "discrimination" against homosexuals. Rather, it was an intentional, directed, discriminatory attack against the Constitutionally protected exercise of Christian beliefs and the tyrannical attempt to use the government to abrogate the Constitutional rights of Christians by forcing them to condone and support the rabid homosexual community's non-Constitutionally protected sense of victimhood. The U.S. Supreme Court recognized this undeniable FACT and rendered its verdict accordingly. 

Uploaded Image


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next