« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The legal case for President Trumpâ��s impeachment just grew stronger 

By: zzstar in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 17 Aug 17 6:40 PM | 78 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 35579 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 35575 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

No basis for that. She's making too many leaps.

That's how democracy and the sense of justice get damaged.

There are other remedies for Trump: Isolation, and eventual removal from office by voters.

Let's not take the Constitution and turn it into a document used for political purposes.

Trump is a clown, and he'll get his due the right way, the way that will show America is great.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
The legal case for President Trump’s impeachment just grew stronger
By: clo
in FFFT3
Thu, 17 Aug 17 4:35 PM
Msg. 35575 of 65535

Expert: There's 'legal basis' for impeaching Trump after Charlottesville comments

Aug 16th 2017 3:19PM

The legal case for President Trump’s impeachment just grew stronger.

That’s one lawyer’s take as calls for his impeachment have grown louder after President Trump, in a fiery exchange with reporters, doubled down on his claims “both sides” were to blame for the violence in Charlottesville. On Tuesday Trump said, “I think there's blame on both sides. And I have no doubt about it. And you don't have any doubt about it either."

In an op-ed on Law Newz, lawyer Elura Nanos points out Article II, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states a president can be impeached upon the “Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.” But what exactly are “high crimes and misdemeanors?”

Citing Harvard Law Professor Noah Feldman, she writes, while Trump’s disastrous press conference isn’t a criminal offense, the historical meaning of “high crimes and misdemeanors” is really any action that “violates the basic principles of government.” She argues under that historical interpretation, Trump’s comments defending the rally qualify as a high crime.

http://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/08/16/expert-theres-legal-basis-for-impeaching-trump-after-charlottesville-comments/23079647/


« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next