It's pretty shocking to see even governing parties are party to the revolutionary plan being played out. Who would have thought they are so prepared.
Two questions:
1. Has the left decided to dump the Muslims?
I say this because they aren't blind, their friends in Europe are getting screwed by them and BLM (led by Muslims) seems to be taking a back seat.
2. What will the left do if the right doesn't take the bate and keeps a lid on their protests?
Their revolution needs two sides. First to blame someone else and, second, to actually use it to initiate chaos to bring down the country. OWS, paid help, didn't get anyone to play and BLM didn't either. All they got out of the latter was a left-wing terrorism label, which they are trying to avoid. Now its statues and countering any other demonstration. Any cause in a pinch that generates conflict and violence.
Stautes? But, 62% of the people are against taking the statues down. The problem is chicken-sht leadership who thinks its a trend they must abide by in taking statues down. Someone should tell them we took a poll of voters and 90% are voting against you if you touch those statues!
What a bunch of morons. It goes to show you, though, that they fear terrorists so they appease them, now they fear leftists and they're trying to appease them.
Did you hear the lefty on Fox today when they said Boston was a counter-demonstration to the moderate conservative's free speech demonstration. That puts the Left squarely against free speech, with an overwhelming turnout. She said, oh, I don't think the Left would agree with that designation, to paraphrase.
Their plans for trouble didn't work out in Boston. I wouldn't be surprised if they somehow adjust their MO to engage in violence of some sort.
I think the leadership of the left, the cabal, has a problem in mobilizing their goons because they have a stupid cause, basically. That's why they still have to pay them. That fact should be exposed broadly, too.
| 
