« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Sanctuary cities in Texas? 

By: lkorrow in POPE IV | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 31 Aug 17 8:23 AM | 70 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 32704 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 32702 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Prof, Interesting, thanks for that info.

I don't see how all the sanctuary cities can get away with violating federal law, as they have been.

Yeah, could get interesting, alright. Never a dull moment!




Avatar




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Sanctuary cities in Texas?
By: monkeytrots
in POPE IV
Thu, 31 Aug 17 7:40 AM
Msg. 32702 of 47202

A Clinton appointee in 1994.

Orlando Luis Garcia is the chief judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. He joined the court in 1994 after being nominated by President Bill Clinton. He has served as the chief judge since 2016.

We'll see how it holds up on appeal. He stands a good probability of being overturned.

The decision will definitely be appealed. Haven't seen the full ruling - but saw nothing in the news article regarding the portion of the law about withholding State funds from sanctuary cities.

His argument was about the Constitutionality of holding people without a warrant. People are held for short periods, without warrants, on 'reasonable suspicion'. Could get interesting.

In most states, prosecutors have up to 72 hours to bring charges. But certain states, including California, give prosecutors only 48 hours before they must file charges or release the suspect. http://blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2012/07/how-long-can-you-be-held-without-charges.html

The rest of the ruling looks like horse hockey.


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next