« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Something VERY ODD About The Las Vegas Shooter’s Weapons 

By: Decomposed in POPE IV | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 04 Oct 17 11:53 PM | 29 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 36014 of 47202
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

October 3, 2017

Something VERY ODD About The Las Vegas Shooter’s Weapons

SilverDoctors.com

A Silver Doctors’ ex-military contact (Iraq War Combat Veteran) brings up some discrepancies with the weapons used by Stephen Pollock in the Las Vegas shooting. Hmmm….

First, there’s this:


Uploaded Image

Uploaded Image

Jacqui Heinrich
✔ ‎@JacquiHeinrich

EXCLUSIVE: photo from inside #MandalayBay shooter’s hotel room shows gun, ammo, hammer, bipod, optics @boston25

7:29 AM - Oct 3, 2017
 

Uploaded Image

From our Weapons Insider (Ex-military Iraq War Combat Veteran)

Uploaded Image

First of all, that’s 5.56 (.223) (as in AR-15/M-4) not 7.62 (AK-47) with a huge scope. That’s important. and on the scope, there is a reason that snipers use one shot with a scope, and a reason why light machine gunners don’t. When rounds are flying out of a rifle like in Las Vegas, a person is not using the scope. It is impossible. How can he see that far to just “spray and pray” from the hip at some 1000 yards away? I don’t think so.
 
Uploaded Image

There’s plenty of footage circling about the “4th floor”. We had our contact go over this clip:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9PiRUzFgL4

Here’s what our insider says:

Uploaded Image


The sound from the rifle does not sound like the pops of 5.56 but the lower, more bass sounding, deeper firing (but not as low or as slow as a 50-cal, plus you’d just have body parts left and nothing much else). That sounds like 7.62 fire, like an AK, or, a 240B (think Rambo).

The footage above sounds a lot like an AK-47/7.62, which has a more destructive bullet anyway, and a lower rate of fire. A 5.56 has a faster fire rate than that. Also, that is way more than a 50 round magazine in that video, which makes me believe it was a belt fed 7.62 rifle, but obviously they did not use a belt linked with tracer fire (too much of a US military/false flag give-away).

If it was not belt fed, how does a sixty year old weakling man-handle a 10 pound AK with a 100 round magazine underneath? He’s not going to, but let’s give him the benefit of the doubt.

So Rambo is shooting from the shoulder (unlikely with scope, even with the “bi-pod”,) or he’s shooting from the hip, but that brings out another problem: If it was a “butt stock bumper” (or whatever they call it) producing the automatic fire rate, you mean to tell me he was rockin’ the rifle and controlling such a massive amount of recoil in what is obviously not just a 50 round magazine?

This does not add up at all.
 

Uploaded Image

Our insider then pointed out this video of a 240 Bravo used by the US military (7.62 caliber round):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6QmMenEIQ8

His comments:

Uploaded Image

See, even the military who trains all the time and is in war all the time has trouble shouldering the weapon.
 
Uploaded Image

Our insider says something doesn’t jibe…

We say hmmm…

http://www.silverdoctors.com/headlines/world-news/sd-contact-something-very-odd-about-the-las-vegas-shooters-weapons/




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months




» You can also:
« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next