« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Revisiting Clinton and Classified Information. Why it is a NOTHING BURGER! 

By: zzstar in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (3)
Sat, 30 Dec 17 11:32 PM | 54 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 39761 of 65535
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/07/revisiting-clinton-and-classified-information/

The Comey tstimony is telling, but creeps don’t mention it fully. It is part of tne record and why they couldn’t and cannot touch Hillary, and never will. Reading this could make a cretin weep loudly.

Quotes :

A.

Gowdy, July 7: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true?

Comey: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.

But later in the hearing, Democratic Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman asked Comey if he knew that the State Department had said that the emails were marked classified in error. Comey replied, “No.”

B.

“The official said that the notations were part of “a standard process” when preparing a phone call, which would be “confidential” until it occurred and then considered unclassified.”

C.

Rep. Matt Cartwright, also a Democrat, asked Comey if the emails were properly classified, and Comey said they were not. (Executive Order 13526 spells out how documents should be properly classified, including a header on the document clearly identifying the email as classified as “confidential,” “secret” or “top secret.”)
Cartwright asked if Clinton could have missed the improper markings. Comey said that that was possible.
Cartwright, July 7: So, if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what’s classified and what’s not classified and we’re following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?

Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.


BINGO!

NO MATTER HOW MANY EMAILS, NO MATTER HOW MUCH SCREAMING, NO MATTER HOW MUCH HATRED, NO MATTER HOW MUCH STUPIDITY, THE ABOVE FACTS OF TESTIMONY INDICATE EXACTLY WHY COMEY SAID A CASE FOR PROSECUTION COULD NOT BE MADE.

As for the “extremely careless” and/or whatever label anyone could claim on what Hillary did, since this 4 so called classified emails, some wrongly classified, others about phone calls to be made(HILARIOUS), and so on, there is no burger there, a NOTHING BURGER., and since there was nothing there, there, the labels themselves about it are BULLSHIT, EXTREMELY CARELESS BULLSHIT.

So, anyone still talking about emails is engaging in

EXTREMELY CARELESS, STUPID BULLSHIT.

And that’s why Gowdy is no longer in that job. He flapped his gums so much, to the point of frothing, but no one ever has been able to live off froth.




» You can also:
« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next