« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Don’t Talk to Police! Legal Behavior Justified a Search 

By: Decomposed in POPE IV | Recommend this post (2)
Wed, 21 Feb 18 7:07 AM | 71 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 44552 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 44549 by capt_nemo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Nemo:

Re: “The driver said that when he was in Washington state, he did carry marijuana in the car, which is legal there.”

Sounds like probable cause to me.

Drugs aren't allowed in Indiana. The guy should have been a little smarter and not blabbed to the cop. He only has himself to blame.




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Don’t Talk to Police! Legal Behavior Justified a Search
By: capt_nemo
in POPE IV
Wed, 21 Feb 18 6:42 AM
Msg. 44549 of 47202

Via The Daily Bell

It was legal to carry weed in his car when he was in Washington state.

But now he was in Indiana, pulled over for a broken headlight. The cop didn’t smell anything suspicious, nor did he suspect the driver of being impaired. But he did ask some questions.

And that is where the driver screwed up. It is hard in the moment. An intimidating person with a gun is interrogating you. But you have got to stay calm and say in the most polite possible way that you will be exercising your right to remain silent.

Try something like, “With all due respect sir, I make it a habit not answer questions without a lawyer present.” The police officer may try to intimidate and bully you, but he cannot establish probable cause based on your refusal to answer his questions.

The cop asked the driver if he had any marijuana in the car. The driver said no. The cop then asked if the driver had ever had any marijuana in the car. The driver said that when he was in Washington state, he did carry marijuana in the car, which is legal there.

Even though the man was admitting only to legal behavior, the police officer used this fact to justify ordering a canine unit to the scene. The dog alerted the officers to drugs, and a search turned up a small amount of marijuana and a hallucinogen called DMT.

The man’s lawyer tried to have the evidence suppressed based on the fact that the officer did not legally establish probable cause to order a canine unit. The stop extended beyond a reasonable time frame while waiting for the drug sniffer to arrive.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-20/dont-talk-police-legal-behavior-justified-search


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next