« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: In case you didnâ��t know, tariffs made up 95% of the US governmentâ��s revenue until 1913, at which point they switched to gaining money through taxing you.  

By: capt_nemo in POPE IV | Recommend this post (2)
Tue, 06 Mar 18 10:19 AM | 71 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 45235 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 45233 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Thats my understanding as well DE. CORPS pay the tax, NOT individuals...........Amazing how they got away with this twist......




Avatar

Realist - Everybody in America is soft, and hates conflict. The cure for this, both in politics and social life, is the same -- hardihood. Give them raw truth.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: In case you didn’t know, tariffs made up 95% of the US government’s revenue until 1913, at which point they switched to gaining money through taxing you.
By: Decomposed
in POPE IV
Tue, 06 Mar 18 9:59 AM
Msg. 45233 of 47202

Nemo:

Re: “In case you didn’t know, tariffs made up 95% of the US government’s revenue until 1913”

Great post!

Yes, tariffs - along with taxes on corporate income - are how the federal government was meant to be financed. Taxing employee income should have been ruled unconstitutional since employee income is not profit for the employee. Employment is simply a matter of a citizen TRADING his or her time and energy for an appropriate number of dollars. It's the same as if I traded my TV to you for your lawnmower. Neither of us profits from the exchange and nobody should have to pay taxes as a result.

Corporate income, on the other hand, represents actual profit. Companies buy goods and hire staff, do whatever they do, then sell the goods or services for more than what it all cost. That's what companies are doing if they're successful, anyway. And the gain is what gets taxed.

The personal income tax is unconstitutional. But that hasn't stopped our government from going ahead with it, has it?


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next