« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Getting sunbeams from cucumbers

By: clo in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 12 Aug 18 4:44 PM | 67 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 26366 of 54829
(This msg. is a reply to 26365 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

and even after the evidence proves them wrong, what do they do... double down!

Trump Wants to Give the Wealthy Another Tax Cut, With No Vote in Congress
By Jonathan Chait JULY 30, 2018

The Trump administration is considering a plan to cut taxes for investors. The idea would be to index capital gains for inflation, so that rather than tax the entire gain of an asset, an investor would subtract the value of inflation, therefore reducing the taxable income.

This plan stands no chance of passage through Congress, which already absorbed a big political hit by passing a huge, regressive tax cut last year. Some right-wing senators have introduced a bill to index capital gains for inflation, but the Republican majority isn’t bothering to push it, because it won’t get enough votes.

But the beautiful part is that Trump hopes to enact another tax cut, this one even more regressive, without passing any legislation through Congress. 
“If it can’t get done through a legislation process, we will look at what tools at Treasury we have to do it on our own and we’ll consider that,” says Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.

Do you remember the years and years of hysterical right-wing denunciations of unilateral executive action by the Obama administration? It’s possible, just possible, that they did not represent a principled belief about the limits of executive statutory interpretation.

The rationale for indexing capital gains taxes to inflation is that it’s unfair for investors to pay tax on income that only represents inflation. That is to say, if you you buy a stock for $1,000, and its value increase to $1,500, under current law, you have to pay tax on the $500 gain when you sell the stock. Under Trump’s proposal, if you suppose inflation during that period totaled 10 percent, then $100 of the gain would be discounted, and you would only be taxed on a $400 gain.

more:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/07/trump-wants-to-unilaterally-give-the-rich-another-tax-cut.html




Avatar

DO SOMETHING!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Getting sunbeams from cucumbers
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Sun, 12 Aug 18 6:57 AM
Msg. 26365 of 54829

I seem to remember csl adopting this line about tax cuts and deficits.

Be patient. The tax cuts will reduce deficits eventually. That's true. If you destroy the economy, there's no economy to borrow against.

But that doesn't make it desirable.

What we are actually seeing is what Dems have said all along. The GoP rewards the wealthy and damages the poor at any price. If that means deficits, no problem.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next