« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Kagan: Not Clear Whether There Will Be a "Middle Position" on SCOTUS Going Forward 

By: micro in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (3)
Sun, 07 Oct 18 1:43 AM | 56 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 09527 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 09517 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

suggestion for Kagan, who really is the least qualified person to be there.

WHY DON'T YOU become that so called "middle" person?

WHY does it need to be someone else? IF YOU are unwilling to be neutral then shut up and be quiet about anyone else.

You can't even carry Brett Kavanaugh's dirty underwear much less his used jock strap...




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Kagan: Not Clear Whether There Will Be a "Middle Position" on SCOTUS Going Forward
By: Beldin
in POPE 5
Sat, 06 Oct 18 11:10 PM
Msg. 09517 of 62138

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/10/06/kagan-not-clear-whether-theyll-be-a-middle-position-on-scotus-going-forward/

Kagan said, "I think it's been an extremely important thing for the court that in the last, really 30 years, starting with Justice O'Connor and continuing with Justice Kennedy, there has been a person who people - found the center where people couldn't predict in that sort of way. And that's enabled the court to look as though it was not owned by one side or another, and was indeed impartial and neutral and fair. And it's not so clear that - I think, going forward, that sort of middle position - you know, it's not so clear whether we'll have it."

Funny, isn't it ... how the "middle" is a meaningless concept and doesn't even exist for libtards when they are in control, but as soon as the American people put libtards out of power, the "middle" is all important and life itself cannot continue without it? 


« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next