So you think it's OK to disenfranchise thousands of legal voters in the hope that it will prevent a few illegal votes, EH? How does that NOT have an effect on the results of an election? If large numbers of people are denied the right to vote, how does this not also create situations where the results can't be trusted?
Are you actually aware of what's going on in states like Georgia, Kansas and North Dakota? In all of this cases, there were changes made to the process of voting that would have been considered unlawful or at least would have required pre-clearance if the Supreme Court had not gutted the 1965 voting rights act in 2013.