STREAM.ORG - never heard of it, so thanks for that.
The author, Jason Scott Jones, doesn't seem to be a fan of Brennan.
---------------
Former CIA Director John Brennan on Sunday criticized House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, saying the GOP lawmaker “abused” his office by issuing a memo with intelligence information declassified by President Donald Trump last week.
“That Devin Nunes and Republicans denied the ability of the minority, the Democrat members of that committee, to put out its report is just appalling,” Brennan said on Sunday’s “Meet The Press.”
LOL - Poor Devin Nunes - he has really been taking it on the chin. Awww, John, you think Devin abused his office by issuing a memo re: intelligence info, but that had been declassified by the Donald? What's the problem, John? Again, LOL, awww, the minority didn't get to release its report is appalling? FWIW,
and IMO, if Nunes had not been so relentless, there is a lot of info we wouldn't know. And had Hitlery been elected, we would know less than zero.
=============
Whoa, nasty dude, huh?
Most Americans don’t remember Mr. Brennan. But I do. I recall that he was the father of the deadly U.S. drone program. Think back. You might remember that this program gave U.S. president Obama the power to kill almost anyone, anywhere in the world. With the push of a button. Oh, of course he was only targeting “terrorists,” the media assured us. So did the likes of Mr. Brennan — the same people who now insist that Obama’s FBI was only investigating “Russian interference” in the 2016 election. How much credibility do any of these people have? How wise or fair was it ever for the U.S. president to have such power over life and death? And to exercise it all around the world?
The answer is "they have no credibility." I guess we should thank our lucky stars that O was only investigating Russian interference in 2016 election and NOT Americans walking down Main Street. IMO, he would have, if he could have.
------------
U.S. drone pilots have struck down no fewer than 178 innocent civilian children in Pakistan and Yemen.
Even though that part of the world is dangerous, I have a very high regard for the education of the honey's cardiologist from Pakistan. Not one child should have been on the receiving end of a drone and its net effect. People most always love their kids, no matter what country they're from.
-------------------
What will our media say in five years if America’s enemies, whose innocent children we have left dead with no memorial, develop the technological capacity to pilot drones into our country? … [W]hen innocent children are struck down in the streets of New York or Washington D.C.? What moral grounds could we pretend to have against such a retaliation?
Depending on what letter appears at the end of who's responsible (D or R, baby!), the media will then decide what to say.
-------------
Thanks, zim
| 