« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: starlight -- Saudi Arabia and other interesting topics

By: Zimbler0 in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 11 Dec 18 12:06 AM | 176 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 21876 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 21872 by starlight)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>>>
SL > My view of the Saudis is totally negative. 9/11 was a joint op -- Iran and Saudi Arabia.
>>>


I am going to disagree with you on that Darling.

I can't see the Saudi government per se aiding and abetting 9-11.
And I can't see a sufficient motive for the Iranians to take the risk
of the sort of military retaliation We could have inflicted upon
them (if we thought they had been behind 9-11).

My money for who funded Osama-bin-hiding-now-dead is the also deceased
saddam Hussein. He had the money from the incredibly corrupted oil for
food thingie and he would have been extremely motivated by the fact that We
were enforcing those 'no-fly' zones over almost two thirds of his
country. Add in the embarrassment of what we did to him because of
the Kuwait invasion . . .

A while back there was some evidence to suggest saddams Iraq was behind
both that world trade center truck bomb, and later 9-11. There were at
least some Iraqi fingerprints on both.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: starlight -- Saudi Arabia and other interesting topics
By: starlight
in CONSTITUTION
Mon, 10 Dec 18 7:24 PM
Msg. 21872 of 21975

Kathy,

My view of the Saudis is totally negative. 9/11 was a joint op -- Iran and Saudi Arabia. And they are pushing the global jihad and the West is opening their doors to it. Except Trump, of course.

I'm just saying why Trump said he's not hassling the Saudis. But the main problem is the oil. We are ok here, but Europe and I think Japan are dependent on Saudi oil. They pump close to what we do and I think recently they were pumping 11 MBPD as a swing supplier with the concern of much of Iran's oil coming off the market. Take their oil off the market and the world's in big trouble. We have a deal with them on that from the WW II era. They could swing to Russia or China for arms and the oil goes with them. Splitting suppliers would be detrimental.

We can go so far and it seems we did by showing our extreme displeasure with MBS' actions, as did the rest of the world. I thought he'd be dead by now, at the hands of the princes that he incarcerated and took billions from. What they do, they will do. So far, the King is backing MBS.

I am told MBS is the lesser of the evils. I think he's very dangerous, actually, but am not an expert and can only say this is being said by experts. We do have a joint interest in Iran. So I consider them friends in name only. Classic "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" in action. If the mullahs go, I'm not so sure MBS will remain friends with us. MBS is also luring investments to Saudi Arabia. My view is they nationalized Aramco, they could nationalize anything in the future and the price of oil is going down, so they might be hurting, going forward and might be inclined to pull the plug on investors. A complex picture.

Another couple of trillion, that would be Trump's. Ouch. Well, we had no choice but to save the military and get high tech back on track before it totally went down the tubes. Obama should have been impeached early on.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next