« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: RIBIT, we were happy for you. And you disappear??? 

By: Decomposed in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 30 Jan 19 5:52 PM | 42 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 22272 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 22254 by micro)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

micro:

Re: "WHY would you need open heart surgery if a stent would take care of the blood flow issue?"
Hey, who's the surgeon general around here?? You should direct your medical questions to me.

The stent's main advantage is that it can be inserted non-invasively, avoiding the trauma, infection and dropped surgical implement risks created by cracking the chest. When non-invasive surgery can be done, it's preferable. Stents are generally removed after 8 to 12 weeks. Doctors do this by cracking the chest.




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: RIBIT, we were happy for you. And you disappear???
By: micro
in POPE 5
Wed, 30 Jan 19 4:49 PM
Msg. 22254 of 62138

Ribs

Stent versus open heart

WHY would you need open heart surgery if a stent would take care of the blood flow issue? Allt he stent does is act like a baloon and open up the artery so more blood flows through it. Much easier on you.
So what if ya has to go back sometime and have another stent? It isn't hard on ya, and there is no recovery time pr se. You go home after the stent is put inplace by running a wire through your artery o the spot where the stent needs to be opened like an umbrella inside the artery.

Piece of cake.. If this accomplishes thes ame thing as the open heart, why would you even consider the open heart surgery?

Is there something else w do not know about with that?


« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next