« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Bond Funds . . .

By: capt_nemo in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 26 Mar 19 4:32 AM | 68 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 28763 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 28756 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

No Idea. Those are old folks investments and slow ones at that LOL...........




Avatar

Realist - Everybody in America is soft, and hates conflict. The cure for this, both in politics and social life, is the same -- hardihood. Give them raw truth.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Bond Funds . . .
By: Zimbler0
in POPE 5
Tue, 26 Mar 19 2:21 AM
Msg. 28756 of 62138

Seems to me . . . a very long time ago . . .
'Conventional Wisdom' was that municipal bonds (or bond fund)
paid out less than corporate bonds (or funds) because the
'no federal income tax' on the municipal bonds made them more
attractive than the corporate ones.

So why . . .

I went looking through my old printouts and reports . . .
And around 2013 to 2014 my corporate bond fund was paying
a yield of maybe three and a half percent . . . while my
municipal bond fund was paying better than found and a half.

For 2018 it looks like my corporate bond fund paid out 2.8% yield.
While one muni fund yielded 3.3% and (my current favorite) is 3.8%.

Any reasons why?
Zim.


« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next