« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: This Is Why The Green New Deal Flopped In The Senate

By: nacl01 in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 27 Mar 19 4:23 PM | 102 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 28874 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 28824 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

FINAL VOTE on Green New Deal fails 0 - 57

Must be quite a passion of hers if she didn’t even vote or it herself!

nacl


- - - - -
View Replies (3) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
This Is Why The Green New Deal Flopped In The Senate
By: Decomposed
in POPE 5
Wed, 27 Mar 19 1:20 AM
Msg. 28824 of 62138

0 - 57. LOL! If AOC ever puts forth another bill, it will automatically be associated with her and the Green New Deal. Whatever it might be, it won't be deemed serious.
`
Three months in and AOC is ruined. I wonder if she knows this?

March 26, 2019

This Is Why The Green New Deal Flopped In The Senate

by Beth Baumann
Townhall.com



Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) followed through with his previous statements and forced a vote on Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's (D-NY) Green New Deal. The legislation was a complete flop despite, with absolutely zero Democrats supporting the legislation. In fact, five Democrats – Sens. Doug Jones (AL), Kyrsten Sinema (AZ), Joe Machin (NY) and Angus King (ME) – voted with the Republicans in opposition to the Green New Deal.

Uploaded Image

Uploaded Image

It's important to note that 2020 Democratic candidates Kamala Harris (CA), Cory Booker (NJ), Elizabeth Warren (MA) and Kirsten Gillibrand (NY) all previously endorsed the Green New Deal but voted "present."

Here's what the Green New Deal would accomplish, if passed (from CNN):

Their plan seeks to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, secure clean air water, and a sustainable environment, create millions of high-wage jobs, switch the country's power demands so that 100% comes renewable sources, mitigate the health effects of pollution and climate change, among other goals

According to Sen. Manchin, he voted "no" because he wants "real solutions that recognized the role fossil fuels will continue to play."

"We cannot successfully address our climate challenge by eliminating sources of energy that countries are committed to using," Manchin said in a statement. "Only through innovating and developing new technologies that reduce carbon emissions will we truly make a difference."

Democrats, however, are calling McConnell's move a "stunt" that takes away from the larger climate change debate.

Uploaded Image


Uploaded Image

Senate Minority Chuck Schumer shared Gillibrand's sentiments.

"[McConnell's] stunt is backfiring and it’s becoming clearer and clearer to the American people that the Republican Party is way behind the times on clean energy and that Democrats are the party willing to take action," Schumer said. "... What's the Republican Party proposal? Is it more coal?"

McConnell explained why he's against the Green New Deal.

"The way to do this, consistent with American values and American capitalism is through technology and innovation," McConnell said, Fox News reported. " ... Not to shut down your economy, throw people out of work, make people reconstruct their homes, get out of their cars, you get the whole drift here. This is nonsense, and if you’re going to sign on to nonsense, you ought to have to vote for nonsense."

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2019/03/26/mcconnell-forces-a-vote-on-the-green-new-deal-and-democrats-respond-by-not-taki-n2543795


« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next