« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: McConnell: 'Assault Weapons' Ban 'Front and Center' in Senate 

By: ribit in POPE 5 | Recommend this post (1)
Fri, 09 Aug 19 9:33 PM | 40 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Pope 5
Msg. 37560 of 62138
(This msg. is a reply to 37545 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I think that ammo is what THEY are going to go after.

...obama practically dried up the ammo market by buying requiring government agencies that had no reason for guns and ammo to buy hundreds of thousands of rounds. The supply went away over night. Over a six month period of time I managed to get together 500 rounds for my remington 700 bdl. I also got 500 for my .45.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: McConnell: 'Assault Weapons' Ban 'Front and Center' in Senate
By: Decomposed
in POPE 5
Fri, 09 Aug 19 7:36 PM
Msg. 37545 of 62138

Beldin:

Re: "Be wary of Wolf, De ... it can be pretty dirty stuff."
Yep, I know about Wolf. What I want is a reserve of 1,000 rounds per gun that will keep my THEORETICAL weapons from ever becoming obsolete due to an inability to obtain ammo. As far as I'm concerned, if I have to undergo a background check one day in order to buy ammo, the ammo is no longer available. I think that ammo is what THEY are going to go after. Firearms themselves will probably be protected by the 2nd Amendment. (Not necessarily, though. I haven't forgotten the Federal Assault Weapons ban of 1994.)

To meet my goal, I don't need quality ammo. I just need something that will keep the guns from ever being dysfunctional. I'll probably lock the stuff up in an airtight container and never look at it again.


« POPE 5 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next