Replies to Msg. #1148367
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
05947 Re: Physicist: The Entire Universe Might Be A Neural Network
   Decomposed > The reason this matters is that global warming theory is...
Zimbler0   6TH POPE   13 Sep 2020
6:05 PM
05944 Re: Physicist: The Entire Universe Might Be A Neural Network
   Great reasoning. I would say those who debate are denonstrating they...
micro   6TH POPE   13 Sep 2020
4:19 PM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: Physicist: The Entire Universe Might Be A Neural Network

By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE
Sun, 13 Sep 20 3:36 PM
Msg. 05943 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 05941 by micro)
Jump to msg. #  

micro:

Re: “that's actually interesting to me. Thanks De! Thumbs Up
To me as well. Glad you liked it.

The article makes an interesting point with broader implications. It notes that general relativity and quantum mechanics are mutually exclusive. They cannot both be correct. They might, in fact, both be wrong and scientists are challenged to figure out whether they are.

The broader implication is that science doesn't usually prove theories RIGHT. But it may prove them wrong and should always strive to. A single "wrong" case disproves a theory. In many cases, an infinite number of "right" cases would be needed to prove it, so no such attempt is made. (An exception exists if a theory has limited possible outcomes - such as a theory that a flipped coin will always land heads, tails, on its edge or not at all.)

The reason this matters is that global warming theory is supposedly "accepted" by scientists and shouldn't be questioned. That's utter rubbish. Scientists must ALWAYS question theories, trying to see if they can prove them wrong or come up with better theories. Those who say "the debate is over" are scientific morons.








Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months