Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: 'Two told ya sews' ,,, 

By: monkeytrots in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 22 Oct 20 3:11 AM | 581 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner 		Msg. 21965 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 21964 by Zimbler0)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>>But it is the Senates job to confirm whether or not a Justice is worthy
of a Supreme Court seat. For whatever reason. And I can not call it
a 'taking without a trial jury'. Denying someone a job is not the
same thing as taking away ones current job.

Making accusations of criminal activity, stripping a man of his reputation.....

Sorry, Zim - you are dead wrong. Those are indeed 'trials without a jury and without the right to confront your accusers and without the right to defend yourself (extremely limited and illegally limited right of self defense.' and most certainly are takings, of liberty, of rights, of reputation.

Slander and libel are criminal acts - and being committed in the guise of 'required examination of qualifications' is ZERO DEFENSE - and certainly NOT within the scope of the 'speech and debate' clauses.

I remember Judge Robert Bork, and the Justice Clarence Thomas affairs quite clearly. Biden and Anita Hill ring any bells? As disgusting, even moreso, than the Kavanaugh case.

Agree with the rest of your post - well said.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Two " told ya sews' ,,,
By: Zimbler0 in CONSTITUTION
Sun, 18 Oct 20 2:57 AM 		Msg. 21964 of 21975

MonkeyTrots > Kavanaugh-gate, Thomas, and Bork(ing) were especially appalling -and violations of "no takings without a trial jury",


Sir,
I don't much remember Justice Clarence Thomas or Robert Bork . . .
Given recent events it would not surprise me that both were unjustly
slandered and maligned.

Judge Kavanaugh? It is my opinion that the democrat party senators
deserve to be hung by the neck until dead for that despicable evil
slanderous hit job they perpetrated. They knew blasey ford had
nothing. They knew she was a liar. And for all of them to scream
"There Must be an FBI investigation" . . . After the FBI had concluded
there was nothing there . . .

But it is the Senates job to confirm whether or not a Justice is worthy
of a Supreme Court seat. For whatever reason. And I can not call it
a 'taking without a trial jury'. Denying someone a job is not the
same thing as taking away ones current job.

Don't get me too wrong, I know Justice Kavanaugh was slandered and
smeared. And if you tell me Clarence and Bork were too, I'd
believe it.

As for President Trump's 'impeachment'. That was quite clearly
an attempt to remove the duly elected President of these United
States. adam schitt was holding a 'show trial'. A kangaroo court
would be another apt description of the proceedings. I do not
believe that any of the 'evidence' presented would have been
admissible in any legal court of law. And the fact that the
Repugnicans was not allowed to call any witnesses just seals the
fact that it was a most unfair, illegal, Un-Constitutional attempt
to overthrow these United States.

These are just my opinions. But.
It is nice to know that I am not the only person who sees it that way.

Zim.

« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next