« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Wearing two masks will provide more protection against COVID-19, Boise doctor says

By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 29 Jan 21 5:55 AM | 50 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 12213 of 58656
(This msg. is a reply to 12207 by ribit)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

ribit:

Re: “Three masks would be like putting a plastic garbage bag over your head.”
Then I truly hate to break this to you...
January 28, 2021

Doctor Tells NBC Americans Should Consider Wearing FOUR Face Masks

Why stop there?

by Paul Joseph Watson
summit.news



Doctor Scott Segal told NBC News that Americans should consider wearing FOUR face masks if they want the most effective protection against spreading COVID-19.

Yes, really.

As we highlighted yesterday, Dr. Fauci advised Americans to begin wearing two masks, saying that it “makes common sense” for more than one layer to be more effective.

However, Fauci was outdone by researchers at Virginia Tech, who said that two face masks only provide 50-75% efficacy and that three masks should be worn to achieve 90% effectiveness.

But why stop at 90 per cent?

According to Dr. Scott Segal, chair of anesthesiology at Wake Forest Baptist Health in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, even that may not be enough.

“If you put three or four masks on, it’s going to filter better because it’s more layers of cloth,” Segal told NBC News.

Doctor Scott Segal told NBC News that Americans should consider wearing FOUR face masks if they want the most effective protection against spreading COVID-19.

Yes, really.

As we highlighted yesterday, Dr. Fauci advised Americans to begin wearing two masks, saying that it “makes common sense” for more than one layer to be more effective.

However, Fauci was outdone by researchers at Virginia Tech, who said that two face masks only provide 50-75% efficacy and that three masks should be worn to achieve 90% effectiveness.

But why stop at 90 per cent?

According to Dr. Scott Segal, chair of anesthesiology at Wake Forest Baptist Health in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, even that may not be enough.

“If you put three or four masks on, it’s going to filter better because it’s more layers of cloth,” Segal told NBC News.

However, Segal’s advice is contradicted by CBS4 Medical Editor Dr. Dave Hnida, who said, “Three masks may be going too far, since that could interfere with the ability to breathe.”

But why concern yourself with trivial matters such as breathing when the wearing of multiple face coverings is so effective in delivering social media clout?

The NBC article also notes how the general public has been conditioned to comply with face mask mandates as part of the ‘new normal’.

“Acceptance of face coverings has come a long way over the past year. Americans increasingly use them as a way to make fashion statements or to show love for their favorite sports teams.”

What will Americans tolerate next? In China, more than a million people have undergone “anal swab coronavirus tests” because authorities say they are more effective.

Time to bend over.

http://summit.news/2021/01/28/doctor-tells-nbc-americans-should-consider-wearing-four-face-masks/




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Wearing two masks will provide more protection against COVID-19, Boise doctor says
By: ribit
in 6TH POPE
Fri, 29 Jan 21 5:13 AM
Msg. 12207 of 58656

...I can hardly breathe with one mask on. Two makes is impossible. Three masks would be like putting a plastic garbage bag over your head.


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next