Two weeks ago, when discussing the imminent avalanche of cash set to be unleashed by the Treasury - as a tsunami of $800BN in extra liquidity hits markets over the next 6 weeks, and a total of $1.1 trillion in the next 10 weeks - we said that \" nobody was paying attention\" to this coming flood of liquidity .
Since then, some have started to pay attention, with Bloomberg writing an article yesterday titled \" Yellen Shift on Vast Treasury Cash Pile Poses Problem for Powell \" in which it described the liquidity \"tsunami\" as a move which aims to return its cash position at the central bank to more normal levels, and which \"will flood the financial system with liquidity and complicate Powell’s ffort to keep a tight grip over money market rates.\"
Sounds awfully familiar... as does this:
“All this cash from the Treasury’s general account will have to go back from the Fed and into the market,” said Manmohan Singh, senior conomist at the International Monetary Fund. “It will drive short term rates lower, as far as they can go.”
Ok, fine - people are finally paying attention.
So what does this mean for markets? Well, traders are clearly pricing in the impact of this liquidity tsunami with the S\u0026amp;P trading at an all time high just shy of 4,000. That was to be expected: after all very previous liquidity deluge has resulted in sharply higher risk prices and there is no reason why the algos should trade this one any different.
But while the surge in stocks is in line with expectations, we have also observed several other more concerning developments. The first is the recent surge in 10Y swap spreads...
... which is factoring the coming inflation that will be released courtesy of the Treasury's soon-to-be unlocked $1.1 trillion.
A more troubling side-effect of this liquidity supernova is the ongoing collapse in short-term rates, which - as a reminder - we also warned about saying \"the plunge in short-term debt (Bill) issuance (since there will no longer be an urgent need to keep cash balances in the $1+ trillion range) will compress short-term spreads (effective FF through 3M) to zero- or ven negative - as there is suddenly a flood of liquidity which could prompt the Fed to ngage the fixed-rate borrowing facility or ven nudging the IOER higher.\"
This, to be sure, is another point which suddenly has veryone's attention and as Curvature's repo export Scott Skyrm writes today in his repo market commentary, \"The market is preparing for a deluge of cash. REG markets are progressively trading at lower rates achday and term markets are well bid.\"
Yes, the GSEs already have more cash in the Repo market these days, but now the monthly cash is about to nter the market - typically from the 19th to the 24th of the month. That means ven more cash chasing the same amount of collateral. Given where term rates are trading, the market is pricing GC to trade around .03% to .02% arly next week. \"
And on, and on, until GC repo hits 0%... and then goes negative sparking another mini repo market crisis, similar to the one from September 2019 only in reverse.
That's the point made by repo guru Zoltan Pozsar, who in his latest Global Money Dispatch note lays out the problem by comparing it to Sept 2019, similar to what we said two weeks ago when we explained that "what is happening now is just the opposite and many, many times bigger, as almost one trillion reserves are about to be injected into the system as cash is drained from the Treasury's account at the Fed.\"
Here's Zoltan: n
During September 2019, we argued that the system was running out of reserves – too much Treasury collateral was ntering the system and we needed a fixed-price, full allotment repo facility to absorb all the excess collateral. Banks’ binding constraint was intraday liquidity, which constrained their ability to lend into the repo market. When their lending stopped, repo popped…
Today, the banking syste iunning out of balance sheet, and money funds are running out of collateral. Soon there will be too much cash in the system; TGA balances will decline from $1.6 trillin to $500 billion by the nd of June.
As the Credit Suisse plumbing experts writes next, \"this roughly $1 trillion decline will occur either through waves of fiscal spending, which will expand deposits and reserves at large banks...
... or, if spending is too slow to meet the $500 billion target, through bill paydowns. Coupon issuance will be $1.4 trillion over the first half, and depending on whether the spending or paydowns scenario dominates, coupons will be bought mostly by banks, or shadow banks.\"
Which brings us to the key part: wh we are about to see another burst of fireworks in the repo market where rates are about to go negative :
Banks don’t have the balance sheet at the bank operating subsidiary level to add $1 trillion of deposits, reserves, and Treasuries: J.P. Morgan can’t grow more due to G-SIB constraints; Citibank flat-lined its balance sheet growth already; Bank of America has the capacity to add only $150 billin of deposits and HQLA; and Wells Fargo’s $500 billion capacity is constrained by its asset growth ban.
Unless we get SLR relief at the bank opco. level, or Wells Fargo’s ban is lifted, banks will have to turn away wealthy households’ and institutions’ deposits, which will then go to money funds. cstong But money funds will face a constraint too: the marginal asset they will direct inflows into – the RRP facility – is capped; ach money fund can place only $30 billion into the facility, which is too little.
Banks’ balance sheet constraint becomes a collateral constraint for money funds, and collateral constraints may surface in both the spending and paydown scenarios. Collateral supply from coupon issuance will absorb this cash over time, but money markets react to what happens now, and with $1 trillion of new cash, there may be many pockets of cllateral scarcity as these flows play out in real time.
Which means that it will be up to the Fed to intervene once again and allow intermediaries to park the extra trillion in cash somewhere, in this case with the reserve currency's central bank:u003
The Fed can hike the RRP rate to 100 bps, but unless it uncaps the facility, bills and repo can still go negative.
And besidesthe repo market, the one place where this particular inversion will unleash shockwaves is the old, familiar FRA-OIS spread which - as veryone remembers from last March - merged as the financial system's key funding indicator. Only this time instead of blowing widr as it did last March...
.. FRA-OIS, already at the tightest level in at least a decade, is about to go negative. Zoltan has more:
\u03To have a view on FRA-OIS, we need to have a view on who will warehouse $1 trillion of reserves that willflood the system by June. Large U.S. banks won’t be able to unless they get SLR relief at the bank operating subsidiary level.
We don’t think that SLR relief is coming, so as the stimulus checks go out, banks will have to turn away institutional non-operating deposits to money funds. The “natural” outlet for these institutional inflows will be at the RRP facility, but the use of this facility is capped at $30 billion per fund. The use of thi facility will be tested not only by stimulus-driven inflows but also by bill paydowns: as bills mature, money funds will look to the RRP facility as a substitute for bills. n Uncapping the RRP facility is more important than adjusting its price; the use of banks’ reserve accounts, the foreign repo pool, or Treasury’s account aren’t capped, so why impose a per-counterparty cap on the RRP facility?
The RRP cap is a key piece of our warehousing puzzle: the $1 trillion of reserves we’re trying to find a warehouse for are currently warehoused by the Treasury; U.S. banks can’t add another $1 trillion to their warehouses, and money funds can’t warehouse $1 trillion unless the Fed decides to uncap the RRP facility.
In practical terms, this means that \" unless the RRP facilty gets uncapped, bill and repo rates can trade negative and money funds may turn away inflows, as they won’t invest at negative rates.\"
And yes, unless he Fed steps in, we may have NIRP among US commercial banks as soon as a few weeks from today: c/p
J.P. Morgan’s SLR problem points to negative deposit rates, and money funds’ RRP capacity problem points to negative bill and repo rates. \u00
And yes, somehow everyone c/st03e missed that JPM's earnings release itself warned very clearly that negative deposit rates c/em 03e are coming in 2021 should \"excess liquidity\" and \"higher capital\" become a fixture - which is about to be the case:
The practical implications for a market trading at all time highs, where there does not appear to be a single cloud in the sky, are alarming:
The implications for FRA-OIS from here are obvious: if U.S. banks are full and money funds can’t take new money either, foreign banks will warehouse reserves at rates below those of J.P. Morgan but above those available in the bill market – and both are negative. cu The price of warehousing is a fee, i.e. a negative rate… c/u
And so, unless the Fed steps in aggressively and either grants banks SLR relief and/or the overnight Reverse Repo Facility is uncapped - so that banks have a place to park the flood of $1.1 trillion in excess cash instead of turning it away - Zoltan expects U.S. dollar Libor-OIS spreads to reach zero by June, with risks to the downside. Needless to say, this would be the first time in US history that the key funding metric has dipped into negative territory. The problem is that just lie with oil - which imploded instantly the moment it dipped below $0 on April 20, 2020, nobody knows just how negative FRA-OIS will drop, with the potential to unleash major money-market shockwaves growing by the second.
Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months
DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS WEBSITE!
The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for a one man team to manually review each and every one of the posts atomicbobs.com gets on a daily basis.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of Atomicbobs. This site may contain adult language, if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to
USE DISCERNMENT
and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Atomicbobs.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Atomicbobs.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This website implements certain security features in order to prevent spam and posting abuse. By making a post on this website you consent to any automated security checks required by our system to authenticate your IP address as belonging to an actual human. It is forbidden to make posts on this website from open proxy servers. By making a post on this website you consent to an automated one time limited port scan of your IP address which is required by our security system to validate the authenticity of your internet connection.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Atomicbobs.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
At some point freedom of speech and copyright law merge. The following interpretation of "Fair Use" and subsequent posting policy were developed with the assistance of qualified legal council however, we are not lawyers and cannot offer you legal advise as to the limits of "Fair Use"
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Though legally each situation is evaluated independently according to guidelines that were intentionally left open to interpretation, we believe generally this policy represents "Fair Use" of any such copyrighted material for the purposes of education and discussion.
You are responsible for what you "publish" on the internet. You must be sure any copyrighted material you choose to post for discussion on this forum falls within the limits of "Fair Use" as defined by the law.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright
we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
If you require a courier address please send a fax or email and we will provide you with the required information.
For expedited human review & removal of potential copyright violations we encourage users & copyright holders to utilize the "Report Copyright Violation" button that accompanies each post published on this website.
In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question. It is our strict policy to disable access to accounts of repeat copyright violators. We will also ban the IP address of repeat offenders from future posting on this website with or without a registered account.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Atomicbobs.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
---
DON'T BREAK THE LAW!
---
Other than that you can do / say whatever you want on this forum.
We reserve the right to block access to this website by any individual or organization at any time for any reason whatsoever or no reason at all.
| 
