« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: 3,332. Thats the number of folks who died from the jungle juice jabs, in the last year.... 

By: hydro_gen in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (3)
Thu, 06 May 21 7:05 PM | 67 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 16897 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 16887 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

READ THE TITLE OF THIS THREAD.

REREAD MY MESSAGE specifically post #16879

I did NOT quote ANY NUMBERS as it relates to the subject of this thread "3,332. Thats the number of folks who died from the jungle juice jabs, in the last year...."

That is a FACT. You are simply WRONG and cannot admit it. That is a fatal flaw for someone who is 'prepping' In the future I obviously shall make sure I am 100% perfectly clear so you cannot attempt to nitpick or parse my comments - if any.

I find it humorous that someone who claims that they have been trying to divorce themselves from society has posted TWNETY SIX THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND FORTY FIVE messages on a chat bored.

And you have no idea who I am so let me be perfectly clear to you now. My convictions will not change unless, and until, I am forced to 'wear a yellow star.' IF we, as Americans allow it to progress to that point then I shall join Patrick Henry “Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? (like vaccines?) Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!”

Stay safe - stay FREE!!!

PEACE

Hydro_gen


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: 3,332. Thats the number of folks who died from the jungle juice jabs, in the last year....
By: Decomposed
in 6TH POPE
Thu, 06 May 21 4:09 PM
Msg. 16887 of 60008

hydro_gen:

Re: “You indeed have misread me as I did not report ANY numbers did I??”
Sure you did. You said, "You need to increase your numbers by a factor of a minimum of 100 as reported numbers to VAERS represent less than 1% of actual reactions based on this Haaaavarrrd Study:" Since "my" number was 3,332, you're saying it should be "a minimum of" 333,200. Your number, not mine.Re: “To wit: Less than 1% of "reactions" are reported to VAERS. Your 4,200 should be 42,000+”420,000. I see your point but don't agree. I expect that few sore arms and headaches are reported, but nearly all DEATHS are. Some people have a tendency to skip the small stuff when they file complaints. NOBODY glosses over "death."

As far as being determined to get some form of "jungle juice jab," yep. That's true. But not soon and not any of the existing three. I'm not anywhere near as concerned about a traditional technology vaccine as I am about a brand new one. When Novavax becomes available, I'll eventually take it. And you know what? Based on the pressures that society will likely apply, I strongly suspect you will eventually take one of them too. I'm not trying to insult you or challenge your conviction, I'm just aware that I've been working toward divorcing myself from society for TWENTY YEARS and am not even close to being society-free. It's a really difficult thing to do. I think society is going to apply increased pressures on the unvaccinated in order to get them "jabbed." If I'm right, staying unvaccinated will be tantamount to a societal divorce. If you're able to stick to your guns once you can't fly on a plane, enter a store, have surgery or buy gas, you'll have shown your conviction to clearly be stronger than mine. BTW, I'm not talking about in the next 6 months or year, but maybe 3 or even 5 years.


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next