« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The American Consumer Is Not Happy

By: micro in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 17 May 21 2:24 PM | 26 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 17395 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 17392 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I disagree throughly with this authors conclusions.
The author is only focused on manufactured goods and people spending money.

They are spending plenty of money. Money thta has been raining on them from the JOE BIDEN admionistration in myriad ways..

Biggest way?? It's hard for emplyers to competye against the Federal Government for employees when the Fed just prints money to pay people to stay at home and sit on their arses. Otherwise more business like restaurants and retailers and manufactuirers would be ramping up their production but THEY CANNOT GET EMPLOYEES....

IF all these manufacturers and restauants start hiring people at prices above what BIDEN is paying the people to stay home. you will really see a sharp rise in goods and services... Historical in scope...

I am counting my blessings I am no longer manufacturing products and worried about employees..

But for some reason the author seems oblivious to the fact that it is difficult toi compete against Uncle Sam when Uncle Sam is paying very well for them to sit on their fat arses and stay at home....

THAT in itself would tell me as an employer when things return somehwat back to a simile of old self, I would not hire ANYONE who sat on their lazt butt and took money and did NOTHING,...That speaks volumes about the individual and their work ethic and drive...

Not in my plant.... I don't want lazy people.. I want people who actually WANT to work and make something and be productive... You cannot teach that. One either has an inner drive and desire to be like that or they do not...

Someone else can keep the lazy ones.. OR, as the BIBLE says: "If a man does not work, he should not eat".

I agree 100 percent.. Laziness is a sin.. And this administration is promoting it and trying to keep people from working...

Its my opinion. Yours could vary.. But I have hired people for over 45 years and worked alongside in my factories with them so I think I have a very hands on perspective...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
The American Consumer Is Not Happy
By: Decomposed
in 6TH POPE
Mon, 17 May 21 12:54 PM
Msg. 17392 of 60008

May 17, 2021

The American Consumer Is Not Happy

by Daniel LaCalle
dlacalle.com.com


The University of Michigan consumer confidence index fell to 82.8 in May, from 88.3 in April. More importantly, the current conditions index slumped to 90.8, from 97.2 and the expectations index declined to 77.6, from 82.7.

Hard data also questions the strength of the recovery. April retail sales were flat, with clothing down 5.1%, general merchandise store sales fell 4.9%, leisure & sporting goods down 3.6% with food & drink services up just by 3%.

BEWARE: Inflation is back!

United States industrial production was also almost flat in April, rising just 0.4% month-on-month in April pushed by a 4% slump in motor vehicle production. You may think this is not that bad until you see that industrial capacity utilization came at 74.7% in April, significantly below the pre-pandemic levels.

Employment also questions the “strong recovery” thesis. Non-farm employment is still down 8.2 million, or 5.4 percent, from pre-pandemic level yet gross domestic product is likely to how a full recovery in the second quarter.

These figures are important because they come after trillions of dollars of so-called stimulus and the entire thesis of the V-shaped recovery comes from a view that consumption is going to soar. Reality shows otherwise. In fact, reality shows that retail sales showed an artificial bump due to the wrongly called stimulus checks only to return to stagnation.

The rise in inflation further questions the idea of a consumption boom, certainly for the middle class. Why? If we look at the 4.2% rise in consumer price index in April includes a 25% increase in energy, a 12% increase in utility prices, a 5.6% increase in transportation services, a 2.2% in medical services etc. As consumers perceive a higher rise in prices, especially in those essential goods and services that we purchase every day, consumption decisions become more prudent and propensity to save rises. This is something that we have seen in numerous countries. In Japan, years of “official” messages about the risk of deflation clashed with citizens’ perception of cost of living, and tendency to save increased, rightly so. Citizens are not stupid, and you can tell them that there is no inflation or that it is transitory, but they feel the rise in cost of living and react accordingly.

Two things should concern us. First, the weakness of the recovery in the middle of the largest fiscal and monetary stimulus seen in decades, and second, the short and diminishing effect of these programs. A two trillion stimulus package creates a very short-term impact that lasts less than five months.

UNITED STATES: Job Slowdown Shows Weak Recovery

I recently had a discussion with Judy Shelton, and she stated that the recovery would be stronger without stimulus. She is probably right.

Neo-Keynesians will likely say that if the above figures persist, the solution is more stimulus, but it is not. More money to government programs means slower growth and weaker recoveries.

The American consumer is not happy. They do not see the official optimism about the job market or the macro figures, and the current sugar-high is likely to lead to an abrupt sugar-low.

http://www.dlacalle.com/en/the-united-states-consumer-is-not-happy/


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next