« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Twitter blue-check seeks enlightenment on why any civilian ‘needs’ an AR-15 

By: ribit in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 27 May 21 8:19 PM | 24 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 17884 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 17876 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

...I have argued that no one "needs" an assault rifle, but they do have the right to own one if they like. My opinion has altered as I am now considering which one to buy.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Twitter blue-check seeks enlightenment on why any civilian ‘needs’ an AR-15
By: Beldin
in 6TH POPE
Thu, 27 May 21 7:07 PM
Msg. 17876 of 60008

http://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2021/05/26/twitter-blue-check-seeks-enlightenment-on-why-any-civilian-needs-an-ar-15/

As Twitchy reported earlier, President Biden’s nominee to head the ATF reiterated his desire to see a ban on AR-15s in a response to a question from Sen. Ted Cruz. We think it was after the Pulse Nightclub shooting in Orlando in 2016 that the AR-15 really became demonized; more than a few journalists purchased them so they could write about how easy it was to get one. One reporter even test-fired an AR-15 at the range, where the “horrifying” act and the noise and the smoke gave him “temporary PTSD.”

We see this question asked a lot, and it always gets answered. Army vet David Weissman has a blue-check for reasons not made clear in his Twitter bio, but he is next in line to ask, “why do civilians need AR-15s?”

David Weissman ~ Enlighten me, why do civilians need AR 15s?

Mr. Weissman's snarky stupidity received LOTS of appropriate responses ... 

House Atreides ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Enlighten me, why do civilians need computers and smartphones for free speech activities?

See how enumerated, constitutional rights work now?

Darth Collapsitarian ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Enlighten me, why should a government be the only ones with guns?

Also, GFY.

Jay ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Enlighten me, why do you need to infringe upon our rights?

Rights are not predicated on need.

The Redneck Doctor ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Enlighten me, when has ANY possession someone has have to be quantified by 'need'?

Nimmo'sGhost ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Because I don't want to be at the mercy of a stupid, raging mob.

Sweatimus Prime ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) They're for shooting bitch ass oathbreakers that come to try and take my stuff. And anyone else's stuff, for that matter.

But you do you, cupcake.

Tommy in da Corner ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Enlighten me: when did your opinion on what I need gain any bearing at all on my rights?

Freiherr Bär von Bärnsdorf und Oberbärgau ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Because it's every citizen's right. It's the Constitution, not the Needstitution.

Also, it's a civilian weapon. It's even manufactured by several companies in Germany for the civilian market.

That being said, even the EU knows it's a civilian rifle.

jößęph ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Because the woke mob is still breaking the same Starbucks windows in the half-deserted cities a year later while the suburbs are fine.

You’re never going to take them away from us. Ever.

COL Flagg/CPT Goldberg/MAJ Brooks/ Ling Chow ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Because they want them. What gives you the right to decide what people can and cannot want and own?

m/ -=EdVT=- m/ ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) It’s not a bill of needs, bitch.

Chris “Vanilla Gorilla” McKeever ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Enlighten me, why can’t you understand what a RIGHT is?

When something is a right, you don’t have to justify to internet randos why you NEED it.

GFY Constructive Comment Box Reader ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Because history repeats itself.

Snarky Tea Smuggler ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) None of your fucking business.

Jerome Montasque ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Because we’re citizens, not civilians.

Moose ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) What has the government done to earn our trust to hold a monopoly on self defense?

monster ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Because all it takes for freedoms to end is other men with guns taking it from you. But you wouldn't understand that.

DisplacedAppalachian -Possum Stan- ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Enlighten me, why don't they? That's the fun fact about a right, @davidmweissman, you have to argue for their restriction. Not their availability.

J.R.S ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Because armed civilians created this nation. It’s a cornerstone of our founding and promise to those who want to take part in the great American experiment. Free men & woman don’t ask permission to defend themselves nor to be a check on out of control powers, foreign or domestic.

Redneck with a paycheck ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Because none of your business and the Constitution says I can.

Jonathan Weimar ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Former Republican turned liberal gaslighter acts like no one saw cities and neighborhoods burn in 2020.

T_p R_ck B_ng ~ (Replying to @davidmweissman) Because it gives muppets like you the vapors.

That’s reason enough.

Uploaded Image


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next