Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: NO CHIT!!! The vac doesn't work,,,,,,,,,,3,791 Vaccinated People in Massachusetts have tested positive for COVID 

By: hydro_gen in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 24 Jun 21 2:45 AM | 29 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 19096 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 19091 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

"Your lancet article (NOT MY article - Lancet's!!) seems clear. It explains that if a population of 100,000 is inoculated and the vaccine is 95% effective at preventing infection, 5,000 people will not be protected from infection." (There is no such thing as a 100% efficacy of the 95% number that is publicized by and from the 'vaccine' manufacturers.)

You did not address this statement from the Lancet article: "It does not mean that 95% of people are protected from disease with the vaccine—a general misconception of vaccine protection......." ((BECAUSE IF ALL NUMBERS are based on the 95% efficacy being 100% correct - that is, a true 95% efficacy if you are 'vaccinated' [it is not a 'vaccine' and these #'s are NOT close!!!] then this must be good koolaide because the 95% number is from the manufacturers - imagine that??))

If there is a general 1% infection rate, then 50 people out of the original 100,000 can be expected to get infected (versus 1,000 if no vaccine had been given.) ((1% of the 5% based on 100% efficacy....sure))

Re: 'Also not sure about your statement that the jungle juice jabs "claim to be 100% effective at preventing SERIOUS illness," - 95% perhaps yet 100%????
So you said ”It's a widely publicized statement. Here's a chart from May 18, 2021 comparing Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen / J&J. I've circled the important part. Novavax has made a comparable claim. ((Just because something is repeated often enough [and recently] does not make it true - not to mention the source!))

I will leave with: "BREAKTHROUGH CASES" and the "DELTA" scarient.

Stay safe - stay FREE!!!

PEACE

Hydro_gen

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: NO CHIT!!! The vac doesn't work,,,,,,,,,,3,791 Vaccinated People in Massachusetts have tested positive for COVID
By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE
Wed, 23 Jun 21 11:58 PM 		Msg. 19091 of 60008

hydro_gen:

Re: “The shots are roughly 95% effective at preventing Covid-19 infection.”Your lancet article seems clear. It explains that if a population of 100,000 is inoculated and the vaccine is 95% effective at preventing infection, 5,000 people will not be protected from infection. If there is a general 1% infection rate, then 50 people out of the original 100,000 can be expected to get infected (versus 1,000 if no vaccine had been given.) Re: 'Also not sure about your statement that the jungle juice jabs "claim to be 100% effective at preventing SERIOUS illness," - 95% perhaps yet 100%????”It's a widely publicized statement. Here's a chart from May 18, 2021 comparing Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen / J&J. I've circled the important part. Novavax has made a comparable claim.


http://www.astho.org/COVID-19/Vaccine-Comparison/

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next