Ribs
sorry you feel that way. I simply have explained why I see the tower collapse differently than Zim and if we disagree its okay. You are never going to know the truth about it anyway so pick your poison as to what you want to go with.
It simply seems to me that the doctoral architects and structural engineers who have spent more than a few years examining footage and evidence and applying known knowledge come up with a far different explanation than those who were contracted by the United States of One World Government money and walk in lock step.
Can You or I or anyone else with 100 percent certainty state the cause of how that building fell like it did, much like we see building taken down by explosives when demolishing a building and keeping it in a confined area?
Of course not. But I can sure as heck see the other side of the viewpoint and in fact believe they make a very compelling case, more so than the one I heard from the governments trusted source... Bu if you want to believe them feel free. You and everyone are entitled to believe what you want to and it is nothing to me. My view is different. I am not going to insult Zim or anyone else intentionally nor fret over it.
I will however go on with my life and use the same scientific principles and engineering standards and reasoning to solve problems for other companies.
At least I am not having to deal with finding the cause of a very tall building falling down like a deck of cards for a living. That is a little above my area of expertise.
It's all good.
| 
