http://www.blacklistednews.com/article/80796/14-ways-official-reports-agreed-with-conspiracy-theorists-on.html
WTF I SAID, Thermite directional explosives,,,,,,,,
OF COURSE they didnt look, they knew they would find the evidence of what really took the towers down........
14. NIST NEVER LOOKED FOR EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE
Q: Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives
or thermite residues?
A: NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.
NIST federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster, FAQ, August 30, 2006. [Online]
There you have it, the “official narrative” condemned with words from the authors’ own hands.
Government experts admit that the twin towers were designed to withstand impacts from jets, and did so, and that the weight-bearing structures of WTC 1&2 were loaded to, at most 50% of their capacity before the impacts of the planes.
They admit that the fires burnt for only 15 minutes and that the trusses passed fire endurance tests eight times longer than that. They admit these fires were never hot enough to melt steel, and yet they admit there were unusually bright flames, molten metal and evidence of incredibly high temperatures and sulfidation of the steel.
They admit the evidence does not support the initial “pancake theory” of collapse and that they have no full explanation of the complete collapse of the twin towers, which they admit happened at near-freefall speed. They even admit that their explanation of WTC7’s collapse “has only a low probability of occurrence”.
They admit that despite this lack of explanation, and witness testimony of molten steel and explosions, they never tested the WTC steel for explosive residue.
And they admit the government removed and destroyed the vast majority of the steel evidence.
Does anything else really need to be said?
YOU CAN READ THE ENTIRE RESEARCH PAPER HERE...
| 
