you said:
If one wants me to believe the government toppled the twin towers on 9-11 there two major factors that will have to be addressed. The first and most obvious – there is no doubt two jet-liners were flown into the world trade center on 9-11. Why couldn't the carnage inflicted have brought down the building?
PLEASE show US ALL where I said that I wanted you to believe anything?
I can show you at least four times where I said it is okay for you to believe what you want to..
Can you do the same in my direction? Did you ever once say it was okay for me to at least want to read some papers to see what was in them and determine myself whether or not I choose to agree with One single part of the work, maybe two pieces, maybe three, or half, or a third or NONE. I HAVE NO CLUE what is in those papers but I am not going to dismiss them out of hand just because they did not come from Popular Mechanics (which I unsubscribed from one year after I wasted my money on them) or because You or Ribit or any ot5her closed minded person does not like any other possible explanation other than the one today..
Show me WHERE YOU SAID it does not matter if I want to read a work by two distinguished Engineers and make up my own mind and that is okay..
NOWHERE is the correct answer.
SO, how exactly are YOU so open minded??? ALL I want to do is have a chance to see and read for myself and draw my own conclusions.. I stated that several times..
You and Ribit both jumped to huge conclusions you did not like because these people in England are not buying the story from our government.. I can't say that I blame them as they NEVER LIE and would not try to hide someting from the People now would they? Of course not...
If YOU or anyone else are happy with the existing narrative, more power to ya. I have no carea about that. Believe what you want for the sixth or seven time..
STOP trying to act like IT IS MY HOPE, DREAM, DESIRE, FANTASY that whatever is in these 3,000 papers of "evidence" (not my words) is that it simply just blows away the gubmint narrative...
So I choose to be open minded about what happened. You have the right to feel the way you DO about what happened and that is fine. For the eigth or ninth time..
CAN we hear you say out loud "it is okay and no skin off my back if Micro and as many people in tyhe world want to read the papers by these engineers to see what they came up with AND if itis compelling enough to warrant a second hard look. " If it is not, who did I bother???? DId I waste YOUR Time??? No? just my own.. DID I force you to abate your feelings toward your opinion of what caused the towers to come down? No?????
DID I tell you more than six times that you are entitled to believe what you want as well as Ribit? YES....
And yet, you and Ribs are trying to call me a conspiracy theorist, saying that I am all for this alternate belief and blah, blah, blah.
when there was nothing ever written that stated that view or position by me... It was all in your angry mind..
Until you guys can actually go back and re-read with clear eyes and lose the anger that anyone dare think different than or be open to the possibility that there may well be a different provable explanation but we have to wait and see how that plays out, you have made up a bunch of stuff maybe hoping I would not read it and call you on it?
The short verbage is you are lieing. I never said what you claim. For the tenth time I did say I want to see those papers. Ialso said it is OKAY for you to think whatever you want to about how the towers came down.
I can hardly argue something that I do not have the scentific proof that without a doubt shows a cause.....
I simply said I WANT TO READ THEM IF POSSIBLE SOMETIME.
WHY does this trouble you so much? Nobody else allowed to read something contrary to your view? It seems that way...
YOU and RIBIT would be better served by STOP TWISTING what I actually wrote into what you want it to say or thought it said and then belittle me because you guys don't like it..
If ya can't bring yerself to see what I am stating is accurate, that is just a shame. That simply means you convinced yourself of an untruth.
So, feel free to say whatever you want. I am not around here much anymore and wont nbe at all tomorrow.. Maybe the next few days.. Maybe permanently.
No sense being someplace where one is not allowed to have an open mind or different view... And that sir is exactly what has happened...
Sometimes, those so called "conspiracy theorists are actually correct but nobody seems to aplogizze for all that less than kind things they said about them when they are shown to have been correct.
I only said I want to READ the papers. I NEVER SAID I take their position because I do not know what is in the papers or how scientific they are the accuracy.. THAT is why I want to SEE them. I am pretty good at troubleshooting things.. Electrical, mechanical, power equipment, pneumatics, hydraulics, Steels and alloys, machining , tc. I review what has been recorded on reports and sheets as to methodologies used and figure out why something is not working properly. THAT is why I read for MYSELF and draw my own conclusions AFTERWARD.
Hope this simple explanation makes sense. You have it wrong and I have told you this several times now and you are like a dog returning to its vomit.. Not a good look.
SO please stop not telling the truth about what I wrote and said...
I could care less what you believe. Its a free country. for the moment.. Believe what you want. (I said that too). I want to wait to review and make up my mind afterward and come to some conclusions before I decide which seems more likely.. I am not basing any decisions on Popular Mechanics, ever.
HAve a good day sir.
If you stop attributing things to me that I did not say, the rebuttals will stop as well.
Sorry you believe there can only be one explanation as to the cause of the collapse.. I wish I were as good an engineer as you are.. You should start your own Engineering Firm..
| 
