« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Popular Mechanics 9/11 Report 

By: micro in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (2)
Sat, 18 Sep 21 1:04 PM | 24 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 24038 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 24031 by CTJ)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

the missing large chunk out of the bottom corner certainly would create a structural state of unsupported weight or over stress on the members above.. That may be a good reason for the collapse of building 2. Thanks for the pic CJ




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Popular Mechanics 9/11 Report
By: CTJ
in 6TH POPE
Sat, 18 Sep 21 3:04 AM
Msg. 24031 of 60008

Building #7

About 90 minutes before it fell, [Fire Chief Daniel said he and other chiefs decided to get out. “We believed from observations inside and out that there was structural damage,” he said. The building had been hit by debris from the collapse of the north tower, 300 feet away. Fires roared.

His account is backed up in two ways. First, in oral histories, firefighters and commanders described retreating from No. 7 because of the expected collapse. Second, photographs taken from a police helicopter show that a large chunk of the bottom of the building had been destroyed by debris from the north tower; a comprehensive study by Popular Mechanics magazine concluded that along the bottom 10 floors, a quarter of the south face was knocked away.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/rosie-odonnell-still-pushing-9-11-conspiracy-theory/

Uploaded Image


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next