« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: if you have not read this you should 

By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 20 Dec 21 3:50 PM | 41 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 27734 of 58726
(This msg. is a reply to 27730 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

micro:

Re: “I can't answer your other questions.”
I said I wouldn't dig into this further but did anyway. A considerably more reputable source, Forbes, covered the subject of graphene oxide in the vaccines. They say it's not there.

July 10, 2021

Graphene Oxide In Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccines? Here Are The Latest Unsupported Claims

by Bruce Y. Lee, Senior Contributor
Forbes.com



Now some are claiming that the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine contains over 99% graphene oxide.

The Covid-19 vaccines are not like those Monday morning surprise dishes at your local restaurant. They aren’t like some of those less regulated dietary supplements that may secretly contain Viagra or steroids either. No, Covid-19 vaccines should not have unexpected ingredients. To make sure people know what they are getting, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has posted an ingredient list for the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine on its website. So, has the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Yet, there are now claims circulating that the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine is around 99% graphene oxide. This despite the fact that graphene oxide does not appear on either the FDA or CDC list. For example, an Instagram post included the following statement: “99% Graphene Oxide in Pfizer V4X? Spanish scientists obtain vial of Pfizer v4xin3 and find that 98-99%.” In this case, “V4X” presumably is shorthand for “vaccine” rather than “vagina for your ex.”

As PolitiFact.com, a nonprofit project operated by the Poynter Institute, described, the post indicated that graphene oxide, “is toxic to the human body and causes a number of problems.” A video accompanying the post featured someone named “Dr. Jane Ruby.” Ruby advanced claims that over 99% of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine consists of graphene oxide and that “There’s no other reason for this to be in here except to murder people.”

Murder people? The Covid-19 vaccine is being used to murder people? You can’t just slip in the word “murder” without offering more explanation or evidence. Imagine telling someone, “I had a great dinner with you, except for when you tried to murder me” or “my boss is OK, except for the whole murder thing.”

(I suggest visiting the link to read the rest. It's worthwhile - pointing out that Dr. Ruby, who seemingly originated the claim, has a doctorate in psychology, not in medicine, and that Ruby claims on her Twitter profile that she is a “Medical Expert”, and that scientists throughout the world are able and HAVE tested the vaccine ingredients without finding them to contain graphene oxide. - De)

http://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/07/10/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/?sh=5a3e87cd74d7




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: if you have not read this you should
By: Decomposed
in 6TH POPE
Mon, 20 Dec 21 3:18 PM
Msg. 27730 of 58726

micro:

Re: “As a professional engineer I find it rather satisfying that someone in the medical field actually took an electron microscope to look at what constitutes these jabs and postulate why do so many who take them come down with interesting symptoms.”
Who are you referring to? I hope not Dr. Robert Young. He's not in the medical field. He's not a doctor. He's got a PhD that he purchased and received 8 months after getting a fake Bachelor's degree.

As for finding it satisfying that someone took an electron microscope and looked into the jabs, that's your prerogative. I'd prefer if someone with medical training - or, better yet, a specialist - had done it.

I can't answer your other questions. I don't know anything about the subject except that it is built upon an incredibly shaky foundation that I do not accept. You're free to do so, of course! I hope you aren't offended by my disagreement.


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next