http://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2022/01/10/cdcs-dr-rochelle-walensky-cant-or-wont-give-bret-baier-a-straight-answer-about-covid-deaths-video/
CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky is on a real hot streak lately!
We already told you about her “Good Morning America” appearance in which she admitted that ackshually, over 75% of COVID deaths occurred in people with at least four — at least four — comorbidities.
Clay Travis ~ The CDC director just said over 75% of “covid deaths” occurred in people with at least four comorbidities. Since Biden can’t shut down covid, suddenly all this data is getting shared publicly.
http://twitter.com/i/status/1480542490897887235
But Walensky can’t kill her credibility and reputation without having a few personality comorbidities herself. One of them is deliberately withholding information from the public. Another is her hopeless ineptitude. She showcased the latter yesterday on ” Fox News Sunday” with Bret Baier:
RNC Research ~ Asked "how many of the 836,000 deaths in the U.S. linked to Covid are FROM Covid or how many are WITH Covid," CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky says "those data will be forthcoming."
http://twitter.com/i/status/1480188113276260363
“Forthcoming”? What’s the holdup? Surely Dr. Walensky has the answer to Baier’s question.
Unless, of course, she has no idea what the answer is. Or she knows what the answer is but knows that the answer will cast aspersions on the CDC’s and Biden administration’s honesty.
Neither of those scenarios are good looks for Walensky et al.
Bryan McNally ~ If the CDC doesn’t know exactly how many they should all be fired for incompetence and should never be allowed to collect data again.
Chris Stigall ~ It’s amazing how often they just break down and admit - “we have no idea” when asked any questions outside of shots and cases.
Do they really have no idea? Or do they know that the truth will be their undoing?
Adam Creighton ~ On the CDC website: "For (the 95% of) deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death."
If that information is on the CDC website and Walensky said it on national TV, then we’re inclined to believe that Walensky is afraid to give Baier a straight answer.
Mark Congleton ~ Translation: “We’re still cooking the books and group testing the explanations.”
Senator Ron Johnson ~ We should have been receiving that data - and a whole lot more - from the start. One of the many COVID scandals that MSM and Big Tech have covered up.
Kyle Lamb ~ So wait ... for two years people were labeled conspiracy theorists for pointing out deaths were being over counted at least somewhat and now the CDC is admitting that is indeed true?
Kyle Lamb ~ Amazing the number of deniers in this thread saying she didn't admit that. She literally said of that distinction they are "following that very carefully" and that "data will be forthcoming." Of course she cushioned it as with Omicron, but she's acknowledging the distinction.
If Rochelle Walensky digs her grave any deeper, she’ll pop out somewhere in China. Which would be entirely appropriate.
Fusilli Spock ~ That thing when your scam is about to be exposed.
For the record, I'm not claiming COVID is a scam, but I am claiming that numbers are being exaggerated by those who want to keep their "emergency powers" as leverage and tools to implement partisan policy.
BDW ~ There’s a game being played here. And we all know it.
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
| 
