« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: clo - you're such a pathetic, screeching moron - just like Madcow

By: Beldin in BAF | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 19 Jan 22 8:43 PM | 24 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 06025 of 06530
(This msg. is a reply to 06024 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

clo has a lot of company in the Hysterical, Bat-Sh!t Crazy Karen Brigade. 

Researchers: Men who don’t comply with mask rules ‘more likely to commit sexual harassment’

It was way back in 2015 when New York police made their first arrests for “manspreading” — the practice of a man sitting on the subway with his legs apart, blocking the seats next to him. We hadn’t heard much about manspreading since, but Kara Alaimo (it’s always a professor) has a piece on CNN’s website comparing the refusal to wear a mask to manspreading and also links it to sexual harassment. It was apparently inspired by Justice Neil Gorsuch’s refusal to wear a mask.

CNN Opinion ~ "We as a society have to demand that men stop using their positions of power to keep women from exercising our own power and participating fully in our society," writes @karaalaimo.

Kara Alaimo, Ph.D. ~ In my latest opinion piece for CNN, I discuss the gender politics of masking up in public places.

Uploaded Image

She writes:

Gorsuch’s choice not to mask up was an act of the same variety as men who “manspread” on the subway by sitting with their legs apart so there isn’t legroom for the person next to them or use “bro language” like referring to their sexual exploits in the workplace. This kind of behavior often makes women feel uncomfortable and even unwelcome in public settings, including their places of work. In the case of Gorsuch’s disregard for Sotomayor, it was particularly inappropriate because not wearing a mask posed a potential threat to her health. ...

Stanford researchers also recently found that men who refuse to comply with Covid rules such as mask wearing are also more likely to commit sexual harassment and have sexist views. This makes perfect sense, since they’re all outrageous displays of entitlement.

She concludes by calling the refusal to wear a mask in public places “a display of staggering entitlement that should leave people of all genders outraged.”

First of all ... 

Uploaded Image

Christopher James ~ How about I do as I please and you wear a hazmat suit if you are so scared.

Gus L ~ Kara Alaimo is afraid of the air, and if you’re not afraid you’re a sexist pig.

Professor Alaimo ~ 

Uploaded Image

“People who don’t wear masks in public places like supermarkets show shocking disregard for the welfare of children under age 2, who are too young to wear masks themselves,” she writes. “Because masks aren’t mandated in my local supermarket, I don’t feel safe bringing my baby inside to pick up groceries. Therefore, like many moms of little ones, when I’m not at work, I practically live under house arrest these days.”

“The behavior of people who refuse to mask up belies a very masculine-oriented, individualistic understanding of ‘freedom.'”

Uploaded Image

Jason M. Kates ~ Why does Kara Alaimo want to date Neil Gorsuch?

Heh heh heh heh heh. Let's ask The Bronx Valley Girl, maybe she knows, eh? 

Lee Fletcher ~ The author sells PR and reputation management consulting, publications ,and education. The article is not meant to express her opinions as much as it is to demonstrate her skill at crafting communication strategies to appeal to an ultra-left audience. This is marketing.

Maresydoats ~ How perfectly silly. If women want to “exercise their own power,” perhaps they’d be better off focusing on important issues, rather than whining about every petty little “gender-based” triviality that comes along.

We’d really like to know more about the methodology behind that Stanford study that linked mask-wearing to sexual harassment. Is this like that research study that proved that “dogs are a tool of white supremacy and gentrification”?

There, there, Karen ... uh, Kara ... it'll be all right ... 

Uploaded Image




Avatar

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
clo - you're such a pathetic, screeching moron - just like Madcow
By: Beldin
in BAF
Wed, 19 Jan 22 2:08 AM
Msg. 06024 of 06530

#msg-1198506

‘How Do You Live With Yourself?’: Rachel Maddow Slams Gorsuch For Keeping Sotomayor From ‘Being Able To Come To Work’

http://www.dailywire.com/news/how-do-you-live-with-yourself-rachel-maddow-slams-gorsuch-for-keeping-sotomayor-from-being-able-to-come-to-work

By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
January 18, 2022

MSNBC host Rachel Maddow lashed out at Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, accusing him of preventing his colleague, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, from “being able to come to work.”

Maddow was responding to reports indicating that Sotomayor has refused to attend the high court’s oral arguments in person because Gorsuch refuses to wear a mask, and she suggested that he might “revel” in the knowledge that everyone now knew that he was the reason she felt unable to come to work.

“It’s folly to try to get inside anyone else’s head, I know, but I just can’t shake this,” Maddow tweeted Tuesday, adding, “Does Justice Gorsuch revel in everyone now knowing that he’s keeping her from being able to come to work? Or is he embarrassed? I mean, how do you live with yourself?”

Writer Marie Myung-Ok Lee responded, saying, “I don’t understand why Gorsuch isn’t the one being exiled for being a d***.”

And others quickly agreed that Gorsuch should have to be the one working remotely if he was not going to wear a mask during oral arguments.

The Daily Caller’s editor-in-chief Geoffrey Ingersoll offered a different perspective, noting that all of the Justices were vaccinated and were constantly being tested.

“Maddow [quoting] NPR’s garbage story is like a multilevel marketing scheme for political hacks,” he said. “They’re all vaxxed and tested every day. Nothing is stopping her from going to work but herself. The shrieking from cultish Covid enthusiasts puts Westboro Baptist to shame, my God.”

Sotomayor is diabetic and at higher risk of complications from a COVID-19 infection — and according to NPR’s report, she opted to wear a mask even when none of the other justices felt the need to do so. As the Omicron variant spread, however, Sotomayor said that she was no longer comfortable working where others remained unmasked.

As The Daily Wire reported:

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor is refusing to take part in person when the Supreme Court takes the bench for one reason: Justice Neil Gorsuch steadfastly refuses to wear a mask, according to a report.

Sotomayor, who has diabetes and has been the only justice to wear a mask since the Court resumed activity in fall of 2021, will only join the other justices through a microphone setup in her chambers. After Chief Justice John Roberts requested that all the justices wear a mask because of the Omicron surge, Gorsuch, who sits next to Sotomayor on the bench, refused, according to NPR.

“Last week, Gorsuch was the only justice in the courtroom not to wear a mask during oral arguments, while Sotomayor and Justice Stephen Breyer both appeared remotely. Breyer, at 83 the oldest member of the court, stayed out of the courtroom after a spokesperson said he received the results of a Covid test that was later determined to be a false positive,” CNBC reported.

So, clo ... you blithering idiot ... they're all vaccinated and constantly tested, so doesn't your vaccine work? Do the tests not work? And, you do know that your Covid demi-god, Fauci, says that masks aren't really effective, right? 


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next