Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Back from the doctor's office 

By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Sat, 22 Jan 22 2:13 AM | 40 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 28759 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 28757 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Re: “I'll give him the article that explains how J&J works, highlighting the part about mRNA.”
It's a NYT article. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/health/johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine.html

The essential part is:


The [ J & J ] adenovirus pushes its DNA into the nucleus. The adenovirus is engineered so it can’t make copies of itself, but the gene for the coronavirus spike protein can be read by the cell and copied into a molecule called messenger RNA, or mRNA. ... The mRNA leaves the nucleus, and the cell’s molecules read its sequence and begin assembling spike proteins. Some of the spike proteins produced by the cell form spikes that migrate to its surface and stick out their tips. The vaccinated cells also break up some of the proteins into fragments, which they present on their surface. These protruding spikes and spike protein fragments can then be recognized by the immune system.

I think this is an excellent article because it explains some things that you won't find in more recent articles about J&J - notably, that J&J *is* mRNA, although couched as something else. And that the J&J adenovirus infects cells it encounters and causes spikes to emerge from them. Now, if the cells are in capillary walls (that are meant to be smooth) and the emerging spikes are seen by platelets, wouldn't the platelets view them as capillary damage that must be clotted? It sure seems to me that they would. Voila - the microclotting problem we've been reading about. This is easily understood. And extremely dangerous to the patient.




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Back from the doctor's office
By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE
Sat, 22 Jan 22 12:36 AM 		Msg. 28757 of 60008

I'm back from my endocrinology appointment. Hey, if I'm back on the board already - where's micro? I figure he's playing up his procedure as long as possible in order to rack up the sympathy points!!!

This was my first appointment with the doc and it went well. It was mostly conversation but also a a few "watch my fingers" and one "drop your trousers so I can grope your testes" moments. Love those. When you think about it, medicine and priesthood are two fields perfectly suited for perverts. I think I'll keep that theory to myself.

He said my right eye is a little off and asked me if I've ever had double vision. I have, but not in recent decades, and it was due to a cyst in my right eyelid, long since corrected.

We talked more about the problem I've got with persistent thirst. It's not diabetes I or II but, coincidentally, it's probably diabetes insipidus... which is unrelated to the other two or even to blood sugar. I'll have to go back to the hospital shortly for a lengthy test to see if that's really what it is. The test will suck. It involves up to seven hours without drinking anything while they monitor my sodium levels and urine output. That might not sound so bad to you guys, but I have a glass of water in arm's reach nearly all the time. When I don't, bad things happen including migraines. They expect me to go seven hours without water. One hour would be unpleasant. I'm dreading it already.

He asked about any medical conditions I've got other than the heart surgery and the migraines. I told him I've got an enlarged prostate. He then asked me how enlarged. I looked him like he was nuts. "Hey, I'm not the one who checked it!" I said, holding up my index finger so he'd understand. He got the message. "Oh," he said. "Then it hasn't been scanned?" LOL. No, my enlarged prostate was discovered the old fashioned way.

Aside from that, the doc asked at the end whether I'm vaccinated. I told him "no," but let him know that I'm not anti-vaccine but anti-mRNA. I think it damages the immune system. ​He told me I should get the J&J shot since it's different... more traditional. I told him that it too is mRNA... but mRNA in the guise of a benign virus that programs the body to generate mRNA. He disagreed. I'm not about to get into a pissing contest about a medical matter with a doctor, but when I return... possibly next week... I'll give him the article that explains how J&J works, highlighting the part about mRNA. This is the second doctor I've seen who didn't know that J&J is, though different, still an mRNA jab. What a disservice they and other similarly misinformed doctors have been doing in so misinforming their patients.

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next