http://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2022/01/31/whats-so-bad-about-this-law-prof-downloaded-spotify-just-to-listen-to-joe-rogans-podcast-and-came-to-some-conclusions/
A couple of weeks back, hematologist, oncologist, and Associate Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at UC San Francisco Dr. Vinay Prasad did the unthinkable and actually listened to Joe Rogan’s podcast.
Vinay Prasad, MD MPH ~ I listened to 6+ hrs of Joe Rogan, Malone & McCullough.
In this 3000 word essay, I fact check the claims.
This will be the single FAIREST analysis of their views you will read.
Some take away lessons.
🧵🧵🧵🧵
http://unherd.com/2022/01/we-need-to-talk-about-the-vaccines/
In that research, Dr. Prasad found that Joe Rogan’s podcast is not simply a platform for misinformation and disinformation, but rather a platform for open discourse. Sometimes Rogan and his guests might be wrong, and sometimes they might be right, and that’s OK.
Iowa Law Professor Andy Grewal recently decided to take a similar approach to Dr. Prasad’s and try listening to the podcast before passing judgment. And, in a shocking turn of events, he, too, found that much of the criticism of Joe Rogan is unwarranted and unfair:
Andy Grewal ~ Okay, the current hysteria made me download Spotify. I've listened to 30 minutes of the most (?) controversial Rogan episode, with Dr. McCullough.
If this episode is representative, I have absolutely no idea why so many celebrities & coastal elites have lost their minds. 1/
Not to mention that infantile shit-for-brains like zzshart have been throwing endless hissy fits, too.
Andy Grewal ~ It seems like Dr. McCullough sometimes says things that are wrong. He claims that COVID re-infection is a "1 in a 7 billion" occurrence, for example.
But it's now obvious that some people will get hit with COVID multiple times, even if you're vaxxed/boosted. 2/
{Cont.} But more important, Rogan's approach is to just ask specific questions and let people speak. Example: "Tell me the people who disagree with your theories. Are they reasonable at all?" 3/
{Cont.} I won't make any medical decisions based on this episode. Dr. McCullough speaks in largely impenetrable medical jargon.
But I think the Twitter elites are probably wrong. I like the Rogan format. Ask very pointed & careful questions, and just let people answer. 4/
{Cont.} I'm now at the part of the episode where Dr. McCullough says that vaccines will cause people to die. But now, Rogan is saying, "Hundreds of millions got this vaccine. And this is fine. Can you explain?"
What's so bad about this? 5/
{Cont.} I've only listened for ~1 hour. And I hate reductionist explanations.
But I think the media hates Rogan because he actually knows how to interview. He asks great questions. His "sin" is letting people respond.
I'll listen to a few more episodes & update if needed. 6/6
Andy Grewal ~ Addendum: I didn't want to download Spotify because I didn't want to listen to ads. But I got only a single ad, at the 5 minute mark (about some "herbal supplement").
So I think (?) you can listen to a Rogan episode mostly without interruption. Make up your own mind. 7/6
{Cont.} I'm on Hour 2 of this "cancelled" interview.
Rogan keeps asking questions that normal people are curious about:
"When will they give you monoclonal antibodies? Why would they refuse it to anyone? I know Ivermectin is controversial -- are antibody treatments different?" 8/6
{Cont.} Again, if this is representative of the Rogan show (I've never listened before), it is utterly insane that the elites want this censored.
Rogan just keeps directly asking questions that most of us, including me, want answers to. That's why, I gather, he gets 11M listeners. 9/6
{Cont.} Nearing the end of the episode. Rogan asks:
"If I invite someone who is a proponent of the vaccines, will you take them on?"
This is the best approach. Let your guests speak. Then challenge them. 10/6
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
| 
