Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Enemies List 

By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Sat, 19 Feb 22 5:40 AM | 44 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 29501 of 58626
(This msg. is a reply to 29496 by CTJ)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

CTJ:

Re: “The problem with building an enemies list, is that when they find out you have an enemies list, they will add you to their enemies list, and throw you in prison.”The databases should be encrypted and decentralized / peer-to-peer, like the old Limewire music sharing software. Peer-to-peer would make them next to impossible to delete. People might be found "in possession" of them and maybe even convicted of some offense, but no person would own or be in control of the data.

The enemies' list would be produced by and queryable from an application reading the enemies' database or a distributed subset thereof, and only individuals authenticating as strong friends of the Constitution would have the privileges needed to insert updates to either database, done by way of an application only they could extract from, perhaps, a THIRD peer-to-peer database.

There would be no upper limit on the number of entries/incidents that could be added for an individual in either database. It should be possible to generate a lengthy report on, say, Hillary's offenses, and also of entries challenging the veracity of those incidents since we wouldn't want the database to go unchecked. Each incident for each listed person should receive a score indicating its severity and believability, the score being contributed by other authenticated friends. Short reports, too, could be produced off the enemies database. Any authenticated friend who enters a high percent of records that are subsequently challenged by numerous other authenticated users would have his own score as a friend lowered, perhaps losing privileges and possibly finding himself moved into "enemy" status.

Many will doubtless have entries in both the friends' and the enemies' databases. Tulsi Gabbard, for instance, could be seen either way. Most of her positions are vile yet she seems to care about the country. So, while she may be an enemy, the system should include a scoring system that gives her an overall rating with higher numbers being worse. Tulsi might be a 6. Al Franken might be an 8. Satan might be a 10. Hillary and Obama would be 11 or greater.

A secondary "enemies" database could be produced daily from the first and posted on various sites for the public to read or download. The contents of the "friends" database should stay confidential, ideally impossible for even the CIA, NSA or FBI to crack.

And that's how I'd set it up. I wouldn't worry about whether individuals and incidents in the enemies' database were one, ten, fifty or one hundred years old. What would matter most would be the final tally, the "evilness score" for each person, generated as a result of an analysis of the entries for that person.








Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Enemies List
By: CTJ in 6TH POPE
Sat, 19 Feb 22 12:51 AM 		Msg. 29496 of 58626

The problem with building an enemies list, is that when they find out you have an enemies list, they will add you to their enemies list, and throw you in prison.


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next