Case CLOSED: Attorney Harmeet K. Dhillon looks at KBJ’s refusal to define a woman from a LEGAL perspective in damning thread
Beyond the fact that Ketanji Brown Jackson was obviously trying to keep from making the ‘woke’ masses angry by defining a woman, the fact she would go in that direction while being ‘interviewed’ by the Senate tells us she doesn’t really care about the law, she cares about the politics.
And as Harmeet K. Dhillon points out, this is not just embarrassingly biased but could have some actual legal ramifications.
Take a gander:
RNC Research ~ SEN. BLACKBURN: "Can you provide a definition of the word 'woman'?"
JACKSON: "No, I can't"
BLACKBURN: "You can't?"
JACKSON: "I'm not a biologist"
http://twitter.com/i/status/1506451123674173443
Seriously? Ah, Ms. Jackson ... you are immature and spineless ... and completely unworthy of passing judgement on anything from the bench. You desperately need to grow up.
Harmeet K. Dhillon ~ How do you adjudicate Title VII claims without being able to to answer this question? Title IX?
Right? If you can’t define what a woman is how can you possibly make judgments based on, around, or even for women? What a huge misstep for KBJ, and what a sad world we live in that she felt this was the only way out when asked a question that could be politically damaging. ...
| 
