« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: It's a shame, but Disney is a very sick organization

By: fizzy in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 29 Mar 22 2:57 AM | 22 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 30785 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 30774 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I didn't know what the "Don't say Gay" bill was, so thanks for bringing me up to speed.

I want to point out that a citizen's greatest duty is to vote. I don't care if you vote in elections, actually, DO YOU VOTE WITH YOUR MONEY???

What can we say about people who take their kids to Disney or subscribe to Disney+ -- when they feel Disney is irredeemably acting against their best interests?

What can we say about any person who CLAIMS to be against Big Tech censoring or Big Tech surveilling -- who BUYS FROM THAT SAME BIG TECH BECAUSE THE PRICE IS CHEAPER OR THE FEATURE SET IS HIGHER?

We can say these people are hypocrites.
We can also say THEY are moral cowards…or, at least, that they are willing to sell their supposed highest values for pennies on the dollar.

I call this "Evil by Proxy". Financially supporting Satan himself as long as Satan gives you a kick-back and doesn't laugh in your face when he comes for your soul, or your child's life, or your supposed sacred Constitution and country.

Aiding and abetting the enemy is aiding and abetting. At the end of the day it doesn't much matter why *WE* knowingly aid and abet EVIL. Presupposing you believe in some God you will have to someday stand before, or if you only want to stand before yourself in a mirror when you shave, “Evil by Proxy” is no excuse, and neither is “Convenience” nor ”Saving money".

Are any of us perfect in this dystopic world? I'm not. But I try not to fool myself, and I don't expect to be forgiven for aiding and abetting. And, yes, I DO try to pay more to make the choices which support my supposed values.

Disney is a company I try hard to boycott, along with Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and ATT. And I'm even beginning to stop buying from Amazon and even Apple.


I have come to realize that men are not born to be free. Liberty is a need felt by a small class of people whom nature has endowed with nobler minds than the mass of men. -Napoleon




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
It's a shame, but Disney is a very sick organization
By: Beldin
in 6TH POPE
Tue, 29 Mar 22 12:09 AM
Msg. 30774 of 60008

For the children: Disney says they ‘remain committed’ to getting the ”Don’t Say Gay” bill repealed

http://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2022/03/28/for-the-children-disney-says-they-remain-committed-to-getting-the-dont-say-gay-bill-repealed/

Anyone hoping that Disney wouldn’t wade into the “Don’t Say Gay” debate was only setting themselves up for disappointment. It didn’t take much pressure at all from purported LGBTQ activists to persuade the children’s entertainment company to speak up and get involved, and of course, CEO Bob Chapek came down on the side of the activists. Because of course he did. God forbid he tell the Woke Mob to go to hell.

Anyway, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the bill into law today, much to Nancy Pelosi’s chagrin, and Disney is just as outraged as she is:

Walt Disney Company ~ Statement from The Walt Disney Company on signing of Florida legislation:
Uploaded Image

OK, so, first of all:

Stephen L. Miller ~ "Also known as" ...

Yeah ... "also known as" only by pedophile-loving libtards ... otherwise known by everyone else by its actual name - the Parental Rights in Education bill. 

Cute trick, Disney. It’s “also known as the ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill” because it’s been grossly misrepresented by media, Democratic politicians, and woke leftists as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill. For the record, it’s also also known as the “Parental Rights in Education” bill. Because that’s what it actually is. Why don’t you call it that?

Dana Loesch ~ The bill is about Parental Rights in Education (literally the name) so again, why is a theme park of quasi-furries hell bent on teaching 4-8 year-olds about getting it on without parental consent? Is that the new "family-friendly" Disney?

It seems fair to ask why Disney is so invested in this.

Phil Kerpen ~ Why does a children's entertainment company want sexual material in grades K through 3?

Christina Pushaw ~ Isn’t Disney supposed to be a family friendly company? Why do they want to teach K-3 grade children about sex and gender theory and hide it from parents?

Maybe this has something to do with it? 

Several Disney Employees Arrested in Major Pedophile Ring Bust: 'Nasty, Nasty People'
http://neonnettle.com/news/16177-several-disney-employees-arrested-in-major-pedophile-ring-bust-nasty-nasty-people-
Uploaded Image

Disney’s statement, just like so many other statements from the bill’s critics, purposefully ignores the nature of the bill.

Amy “Ice Shanty Hoe” Curtis ~ The bill: Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.

That seems pretty reasonable, Disney. Don’t teach young kids about sexuality or gender identity in the classroom without their parents’ consent.

Disney’s outrage is noted. It is, however, not worth a damn. Because at the end of the day, Disney hearts China.

Matt Cover ~ Meanwhile, the CCP uses literal slave labor in many of its industries ...

If withholding complicated discussions about sexuality from a bunch of first graders is a violation of their human rights, then what the hell would Disney call China’s Uyghur genocide? Price of doing business?


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next