De:
"Also, unlike the Johnson & Johnson product which cannot replicate, the AstraZeneca replicates in the body a limited amount.
mRNA vaccines: Moderna, Pfizer
Adenovirus vaccines: Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, Sputnik V
How J&J is different from mRNA
The Johnson & Johnson vaccine is not an mRNA vaccine (like Pfizer and Moderna). All three vaccines deliver genetic material to your cells: mRNA vaccines deliver mRNA, and Johnson &"
Actually, no. J&J delivers a *DNA* based adenovirus which encodes for the spike protein. This is *OLD* technology, which has been used for decades, and so you have the *considerable* benefit of knowing the adenovirus AS A VECTOR for the portion of the disease virus you want the body to identify and target has - at least - been *well* studied for unexpected adverse events.
The J&J vaccine does NOT contain the pseudo-uridine which the mRNA vaccines substituted to create run-away spike production. In addition, the J&J adenovirus is crippled so it CAN'T itself replicate.
This is a really important distinction, which you are not giving proper recognition to. It means that while the J&J DOES cause some cells of your body to produce some spikes, the number of spikes produced is relatively very, very limited, in two different ways. So you don't get this incredibly dangerous and outrageous behavior of unlimited spread AND probably not any risk of reverse transcriptase modifying DNA throughout your body.
The mRNA vaccines were NEVER required...the adenovirus route was always the vastly safer alternative. But you know how it is with government "scientists": most of them couldn't cut it in the real world because they are more about power and perquisites than they are about quality science, free markets, significant intelligence.
| 
