Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The left has a peculiarly warped view of motherhood 

By: Zimbler0 in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Sat, 25 Jun 22 9:12 PM | 19 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 33172 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 33160 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>>>
Abortion pills are federally approved medications and Attorney General Merrick Garland has already declared that “states may not ban mifepristone based on disagreement with the FDA’s expert judgment about its safety and efficacy.”
>>>

Actually,
I'm pretty sure that that pea-brained Un-Constitutionally minded moron does NOT have the authority to do such a thing. The United States Congress might . . .

As for the claim "“People who could have cured cancer...will never get the chance because they are forced to care for children they did not want.” . . .

Lets try 'The Person Who Might Have Cured Cancer Could NOT Because She Got Aborted.'

Personally, I think the 'morning after' pill ought to be readily and freely available over the counter . . . But ONLY if it has indeed been proven to be safe and effective. (Given the track record for the covid vaccines 'safety' . . . I don't know if we can or should trust the 'science' any more.)

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
The left has a peculiarly warped view of motherhood
By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE
Sat, 25 Jun 22 12:58 PM 		Msg. 33160 of 60008

June 25, 2022

The left has a peculiarly warped view of motherhood

It’s apparent that, significant evidence to the contrary, they believe motherhood is a valueless role that permanently handicaps women.

by Pandra Selinavov
AmericanThinker.com

The Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade. After almost fifty years and millions of abortions, the highest legal authority in the United States has returned the regulation of abortion to the states. And with that decision now on the books, the left is having the group equivalent of a complete psychotic break.

Considering that the rhetoric of abortion and the rhetoric of slavery are virtually identical, the Dobbs decision is not a step forward (or backward, depending on your perspective). Abortion is still founded on the doctrine that an unborn human is not a person. An unborn human is a piece of property, to be cherished or disposed of as the owner/mother sees fit. And even under Dobbs, Abortions will continue.

Abortion pills are federally approved medications and Attorney General Merrick Garland has already declared that “states may not ban mifepristone based on disagreement with the FDA’s expert judgment about its safety and efficacy.” A number of major companies have announced they will cover travel expenses for employees who want to get an abortion. The companies on board with abortion include Disney, Netflix, Paramount, Comcast, Warner Bros., Discovery, Sony, and Meta. Celebrities are reacting with terror to the idea that babies might be born instead of sacrificed.


Image: Marie Curie and her daughters, Ève and Irene, 1908. CC BY 4.0.
(Irene, who had two children, received a Nobel Prize in chemistry.)

As disturbing as these reactions are, it was an article by an individual named Jaclyn Friedman that I found most troubling. Among other horrors that she believes babies inflict on their mothers, she says “People who could have cured cancer...will never get the chance because they are forced to care for children they did not want.” (Wow. I never thought of it like that. So, what the left is saying is that clo would probably have gone on to cure cancer if only she had been allowed to spread her legs for the entire football team while not having to raise her son Paul. The only problem I see in that is that she didn't put much time into raising Paul... was a lousy mother... spread her legs for pretty much anyone who'd have her... and didn't accomplish a single thing in her whole damned life except to ruin three men's lives. Oh well. It was only a theory. - De)

I think it’s the comment about people who could have cured cancer who will never get the chance because they are forced to care for unwanted children that goes to my heart the most. Marie Curie won the Nobel Prize twice. She also had two children. Jennifer Doudna has a son but she still found time to help develop CRISPR, the genetic-engineering method that can be used to treat sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, Huntington’s disease, and HIV. Maria Goeppert Mayer’s two children didn’t stop her from picking up a Nobel Prize in 1963 for discovering the nuclear shell of the atomic nucleus. Sara Seager discovered 715 planets while being a mother to two children.

There are many more women in the field of science alone who are proud mothers as well as rigorous intellectuals. The left would have us believe that women cannot be productive members of society as well as mothers. There are many children of great women who would vehemently disagree with that characterization.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/06/the_left_has_a_peculiarly_warped_view_of_motherhood.html

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next