Walker and Oz are both for Senate.
If I remember the article from a month or so back (before the latest "made for TV" Democrat moves in stock surge; Pelosi to Taiwan; Trump rate; etc.) correctly, Pennsylvania was NOT one of the Senate races Repubs were likely to take. Pennsylvania is simply a "Team Blue" state -- thoroughly lost, like N.Y. or CT. So, even if his opponent were Hunter Biden himself -- with laptop, underage prostitutes, drugs, and foreign booty on public display -- Oz would likely lose there.
Walker, on the other hand, is from Georgia. Georgia IS one of the ONLY FOUR states where the Dems were considered vulnerable. So, Walker is (currently) "merely" losing by a lot more than expected. That isn't good news, certainly, but it isn't lethal, either. Az was another of the four, and unfortunately the Dems are surging there, as well.
So, if I am correct, that leaves Wisconsin and NH as the other two of the true battleground states. Dems are leading in Wisconsin, against Ron Johnson. I consider that shocking, personally, as I thought people would strongly support Johnson: both as the incumbent, but also as a person of extreme integrity, courage, and intelligence (he arranged - and was the only Senator in attendance - the Covid/Vax testimony). Still, though, he was in one of the real battleground states...not necessarily *expected* to be one by Republicans.
I don't recall Tucker Carlson directly referring to ANY House seats. Did he?
So, maybe this isn't YET so desperate a situation as it seems? If Republicans can take NH, but lose Georgia, AZ, and WI, and hold all their other existing seats, that should still be enough to tip the Senate by one.
So why was Tucker so apocalyptic sounding? I'm not saying he is off base, the surge in small donor Democratic donations is a really bad sign, because the money can be spent anywhere...and likely a lot of it will go to try and hold NH. And if it is really a trend, and the trend keeps gathering momentum, it could turn everything else pretty hopeless pretty quickly.
Anyway, I am feeling -- at the moment -- a bit more hopeful. Still, I think Tucker may be correct...and Repub "leadership" doesn't actually seem too interested in "winning" in November. (Maybe Mitch and Lindsay get big bonuses if they can "lead" the Republicans to the slaughter? Stranger things have happened in the past few years).
Hopefully THE Republican CANDIDATES WHO ACTUALLY WANT TO WIN will consider breaking from the Republican "leadership" soon, and try some different tactics and messaging.
NOBODY who holds a NON-government job paying less than maybe $80K/year can intelligently be happy about flooding the country with millions and millions of illegal immigrants. Under $80K is unskilled labor territory, and Democrats are, therefore, DESTROYING what used to be their core constituency by flooding the country with minimum wage (or less) illegals, drugs, and demonstrated SCOFFLAWS.
I didn't think Tucker delivered tonights message in order to discourage us. I took it as a red alert, though, that "the trend is NOT our friend".
Hopefully Tucker's bad news will reach the right people and, especially, the patriotic and true candidates. And they will BREAK decisively from McConnell, Graham, et. al. in their messaging!?
Less than three months to go now! We really, really need to take BOTH the House AND the Senate. And we really need to do that with a pretty strong margin, in order to be sure and to obviate the *expected* continued treachery of RINOs, NeoCons, DemonRats, and Deep State "public serpents".
| 