Micro,
There may be graphene oxide in one, or more, of the vaccines. The article I linked makes clear graphene was being proposed as a vaccine adjuvant - whether it made it into these, or not, I don't know for sure.
However, I see at least a couple potentially big problems with your links:
(1) They are all from/tied to a "Dr" Robert Young; and Dr. Young did not take a normal path to his "science" qualifications, to put it politely.
(2) One of the KEY principles of science is that work is reproducible by others aka "peer reviewed". Not reproducible and not peer reviewed == not science, pretty much.
Why hasn't anyone -- say Malone or Dr. Ryan Cole, either of whom both know their way around microscopes and really digging into the forensics -- peer reviewed and seconded the findings? Or have they? Has anyone?
(3) The article I opened said, over and over again, that ALL FOUR "vaccines" used graphene. However, ALL the photo attributions I saw through the article say they are of Pfizer's mRNA product, only. Where is the evidence linked to the other three? We don't want to call them out without good evidence or that will set us back.
| 