Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: graphene found in covid vaccine with URL pages listed

By: Fiz in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 30 Aug 22 8:25 PM | 21 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 35097 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 35093 by Fiz)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Here is, I think, where I first heard rumors of graphene oxide. Japan pulled some Moderna vaccine due to "black particles" in "one" vial:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-58405210

http://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/07/10/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/?sh=f68ae2774d71

It should be trivially easy to prove if there is graphene oxide in a vaccine. Probably more than 1 million people around the world are more than qualified to prove it, have the equipment to prove it, and would benefit academically/professionally from proving it.

This isn't something "hard", like proving the vaccines cause harm.

I'm not saying there isn't peer-pressure or even conspiracy. I'm just saying graphene oxide would be a cake walk to peer review. But it remains unconfirmed.

I think the spike proteins and pseudouridine are enough and we should focus on them, as the peer review process continues to validate their reality and danger.

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: graphene found in covid vaccine with URL pages listed
By: Fiz in 6TH POPE
Tue, 30 Aug 22 7:51 PM 		Msg. 35093 of 60008

Micro,

There may be graphene oxide in one, or more, of the vaccines. The article I linked makes clear graphene was being proposed as a vaccine adjuvant - whether it made it into these, or not, I don't know for sure.

However, I see at least a couple potentially big problems with your links:

(1) They are all from/tied to a "Dr" Robert Young; and Dr. Young did not take a normal path to his "science" qualifications, to put it politely.

(2) One of the KEY principles of science is that work is reproducible by others aka "peer reviewed". Not reproducible and not peer reviewed == not science, pretty much.

Why hasn't anyone -- say Malone or Dr. Ryan Cole, either of whom both know their way around microscopes and really digging into the forensics -- peer reviewed and seconded the findings? Or have they? Has anyone?

(3) The article I opened said, over and over again, that ALL FOUR "vaccines" used graphene. However, ALL the photo attributions I saw through the article say they are of Pfizer's mRNA product, only. Where is the evidence linked to the other three? We don't want to call them out without good evidence or that will set us back.

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next