Writing from the Denver airport.
Yes, I see it as VERY significant (although I want to say I didn't dig too deep into that article, as I was rushing to leave).
First, if ivermection works/doesn't work, it bears directly to the disinformation question and the idea that crimes against humanity would be appropriate for all the suppression and deaths that were, thus, more like murders.
Second, a lot of people continue to get pressured to take mRNA shots and FDA has already approved new mRNA vaccines for the new variants.
Third, the Covid vaccines -- including the new one which has been commissioned by our government -- are STILL **ONLY** approved under EUA **because** there is supposedly "no other treatment". For older people, or people with impaired immune systems, even these milder Covids can kill. But if ivermectin works, not only should it be known, so it can save lives, but the EUA should (MUST, actually) be immediately dropped (so it can save lives by not being dispensed).
Fourth, although I am feeling more hopeful Covid isn't coming back in any more virulent form, I would not bet too much on that. Geert Vanden Bosche is, so far, looking wrong in his theory that Covid will come back in a vastly more deadly form. However, it is too early to be too confident. The virus is still under immense pressure to find a way to escape the limited immune response that vaccinated people have. It is still mutating like crazy and the "jackpot" for the virus would be to break past the limited vaccine protection and, probably, attack the lungs again. If that happens, Geert feels the vaccinated (not the unvaccinated) will be slaughtered in the millions. The ONLY check he sees in that case is chemical prophilaxis ... e.g., ivermectin, HCQ, etc.
Anyway, to borrow a trite term from rbits, the fat lady hasn't sung yet. Does that mean she won't sing, or it just an unusually long opera?
| 
