« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Thoreau (cactus flower reply) 

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 13 Sep 22 8:45 PM | 40 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 47029 of 54809
(This msg. is a reply to 47026 by Fiz)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

There's no doubt I don't know every detail of US politics. Nor care to for that matter. But that is true of everyone.

On the other hand, I know some. I might even have had American citizenship if I had wanted it. But happily for y'all, I did not.

Crazy as it seems, I was aware of Thoreau, but more as a guy who went into the woods and lived by a pond than as a political commentator. I thought he was known for environmentalism. But you are right that he didn't catch my eye and I haven't studied him. I did address the quote you shared, and I thought it was not a wise one, and it rather reassured me I hadn't missed out from a political perspective. I'm interested in people who say interesting things wherever they are from. Similarly, if they haven't something new or interesting to say on a subject, it doesn't much matter to me if they are American or English.

It sounds like you may believe that Americans are the only folks who might conceivably have worthwhile insights about American politics. Maybe you posted here because you were hoping clo would repond. I will leave that to her. My own view is that a dose or two of foreign perspective is useful in any conversation. After all, you might not exist as an entity without the immigration of folks from my country, or think of yourself as exceptional without de Tocqueville.

But just so you are aware of my position in this particular conversation. I think the worthwhile part of a discussion about insurrections and their justification is not so much the bit about where they occur, but the arguments for them and those against them wherever they are and whenever they occurred. And that is what I am addressing.

Can they be justified?

I left you some space to respond to my previous post.

My point about John of Salisbury begged the question of who might reasonably restrain a tyrant. Magna Carta helps answer it. Back then, it was the barons and the bishops.

My view is also that it's hard to understand the American constitution and its ideas of justice without a firm grounding in English history. From Englnd's Magna Carta, Americans have the rule of law and the fourth amendment. From John Locke, much of Jefferson's philosophy. Substantial contributions.

I also brought up Shakespeare and Wilkes Booth, but I didn't mention the play by the former that had an influence upon the latter. That would be Julius Caesar.

Wilkes Booth revered in particular the character of Brutus, the most famous of Caesar's assassins. Brutus was noble. He had a loyalty, which was to the Republic. “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say, that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his. If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all freemen? As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him: but as he was ambitious, I slew him. There is tears, for his love; joy, for his fortune; honour, for his valour; and death, for his ambition.”

“Sic semper tyrannis!” John Wilkes Booth shouted as he shot Lincoln in the head. Ever thus to tyrants! It is a Latin phrase thought by some to have been said by Brutus over the wounded Caesar before he stabbed him. “The South is avenged,” he finished up.

Wilkes Booth is a good place to start when thinking about why arrogant men who believe themselves principled do foolish and sometimes wicked things. He might have got along with your Thoreau.

Shakespeare’s work, then, is an inheritance of both America and England. Nations aren't islands, culturally-speaking. Ours are entwined, one way or another. But it seems I have the advantage over you in having some knowledge of both.

I'm not as convinced as you are that the distinction between a republic and a democracy is particularly wide, unless you wish to define democracy narrowly, in the Athenian way, instead of broadly and inclusively, as the English language permits. My country is a constitutional monarchy and also a parliamentary democracy. Yours is a republic with a written constitution and you also vote using slightly funky democratic machinery for your representatives and your president. We are both democracies and we are also other things too.

It sounds like you believe Democrats are wicked cheats and Republicans are heroes defending Americans from them and their manipulation. I don't think you are right, but once a person goes down the deep state rabbit hole, there's no digging them out. So that ain't what I plan to do.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Thoreau (cactus flower reply)
By: Fiz
in ALEA
Tue, 13 Sep 22 6:27 PM
Msg. 47026 of 54809

"I have no interest in individuals who think themselves wiser than the people, taken as a whole, and who propound and employ violence against the elected government as a tool. Nor in those who seek to undermine or control the election machinery to procure the results they wish for. Both belong in jail."

I TOTALLY agree with you here!

The US has long had persistent, SYSTEMIC problems in large-scale voter and judiciary fraud. Did you know that? In particular, in our largest cities it is well documented:

(e.g., Chicago http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/164338, New York http://www.history.com/topics/us-politics/tammany-hall. Baltimore http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltimore_Crew. Philidephia http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2020/11/07/philadelphias_long_history_of_corruption_and_fraud_528760.html) the fraud has historically been recurrent and rampant.)

You know why, right? Many, arguably most, of the largest US cities were effectively "ruled" by major, interconnected Mafia crime family syndicates as recently as a few decades ago? Those crime families still remain in those cities, even as they have taken measures to lower their profile and hide their past.

Do to the distributed nature of our system, one large MODERN city can easily swing a Congressional or even a Presidential election for an entire state. A FEW states, in this way, can easily swing a federal election. The US is, again, not a "pure" Democracy. It was built to tie together a bunch of geographically and culturally "independent" communities and INDEPENDENT states. That is what our system is good for. But only if the elections are demonstrably FAIR and the people are not too divided. If a MAJOR city or two is corrupted, the whole election can be corrupted.

Are you aware that "Speaker of the House" Nancy Pelsi is the daughter of a Mafia-connected family that dominated Baltimore? http://www.baltimoresun.com/politics/bs-md-pol-dalesandro-family-20191021-w5ftn3ue2zdhfhzvvjr6fmu644-story.html. http://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/18321673-nancy-pelosi-s-father-had-baltimore-mafia-ties.

Have you seen the movie The Godfather? That was not wild fantasy, I hope you know? It was fictional, but largely historically based. You might want to watch it again, to get some real idea of how things work in “the family” and how little control the legitimate US government HAS of the situation.

Are you aware that Rudy Giuliani was instrumental in wrecking the crime family syndicate and its stranglehold on governance in NY City? That happened only in 1986: http://themobmuseum.org/notable_names/rudolph-giuliani/. http://detailedpedia.com/wiki-Mafia_Commission_Trial.

http://www.coreysdigs.com › law-order › rudy-rico-and-clinton-inc-racketeeringRudy, RICO, and Clinton Inc. Racketeering - coreysdigs.com
“Rudy Giuliani, an expert on RICO, as the first prosecutor to use RICO in a major federal case, has stated in numerous interviews that this evidence, as well as other pieces of evidence warrants a criminal investigation into the Clintons and the use of their official positions for personal profit.”

Giuliani went on to be elected mayor of NY City and he left it in VASTLY better shape when he left office (it was a real mess, in every sense, before). The argument can be defended that Giuliani IS a real hero, with real courage and integrity. Taking on the mafia as he did could have easily cost him dearly...his life or more, because that is how the mafia operates. (Again, I suggest The Godfather as an education for you on how things really worked in the US at that time)

Hopefully you recognize the name Rudy Giuliani? He took on the role of investigating the claims of systematic voter fraud after the 2020 election. Certain elements within “the State” attached to the Democratic party attacked him. He is no fool, no tool, and arguably an incredibly brave and honest man, as is well documented in his history of routing out corruption as a lawyer, prosecutor, Mafia buster, and NY mayor. He has approximately as much substantiated integrity as the Queen of England, I would say.

He also played a major role in uncovering the Hunter Biden laptop. Which the Administrative State in collaboration with the main stream media conveniently and systematically denied and suppressed...until the "election" was over. But which is now acknowledged as REAL.

I had a much longer response written, but it got eaten before I could post it. I am posting this with inadequate editing, but hopefully it gives you significant food for thought. To put it bluntly, but I think honestly: you are not COMPETENT to have too solid an opinion on US politics, the deficiencies in US politics because you don't have near enough background knowledge, and especially not lifelong boots-on-the-ground knowledge.

You didn't even know who Thoreau was, which is understandable, but indicative of a VAST ignorance about how things actually work in the US. But you are jumping into US politics, and taking a side, when you clearly aren't competent to do that.

You are clearly a REALLY SMART AND WELL EDUCATED individual. I mean that sincerely. And you are also gracious and, I think, broad-minded in giving me space here to say what I am saying. But, just as it would be dangerous for me to jump in and start lecturing you and other well-educated UK citizens on the deficiencies and cures for English politics, you are not competent to speak too much about US politics and our recent travails.

You may know the technical difference between a democracy and a republic, but you don't know that experiential, because you haven't lived your life in THIS Republic...and watched the corruption spreading through the institutions, especially the schools. You don't really know our history very well, particularly the historic problems of Mafia-run cities and Mafia-run politics.

The US holds together, at this juncture, ONLY because it is a very, very well-built Republic, with lots of checks and balances. At this point we have an oligarchy in control of the CENTRALIZED reins of power in the US (the US was supposed to remain decentralized, with power going citizen->state-federal; that has now been Unconstitutionally undermined).

At this point US elections are ONLY meant to serve as Bread and Circus: to keep the citizens placated and keep the Administrative State and its toadies in power. The 2016 election cycle took the US oligarchy by surprise; much as BREXIT apparently did in the UK.

The 2020 election cycle OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN thoroughly carefully watched and thoroughly investigated. It was not. It intentionally was not. Covid lockdowns were used to justify a vast expansion in mail in ballots, which could not be carefully monitored.

The US Founders were generally quite educated and, in particular, they admired the historian Polybius. His analysis of why the early Roman republic was so resilient and relatively civil, informed them. They modified the Roman formula to make it even more resistant to corruption.

It is stunning how ignorant the average American NOW is about history in general and the origins of the US system, in particular. Few in the US can now tell you the distinction between a democracy and a republic, in spite of the fact that THE US WAS CAREFULLY DESIGNED NOT AS A "DEMOCRACY" BUT RATHER AS A REPUBLIC and that the difference is vast.

Benjamin Franklin: http://thenewamerican.com/a-republic-if-you-can-keep-it/


---
P.S. What is the source of the long quote? I presume it was originally in Latin and you quoted it to make some particular point? I confess I don't speak Latin, although I have studied Roman history somewhat.

I hope to keep on corresponding with you. I don't think the gap between us is irreconcilable, and I respect your reasoned arguments. I hope you will take the time to reasonably consider mine.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next