I just starred your post. That is what I think of you: you are intelligent, widely read, and capable of wide-ranging civil debate. You deserve a star! (I will confess I also gave myself a star, as I thought I deserved one for completing that last essay, in reasonable fashion, while providing some substance for you to dig into. ;-).
I believe, you are also capable of evolving your judgement to accommodate new information: you have demonstrated that to me. I expect you know a lot of things I don't know about English and European history and inner workings. You deserve respect on those bases.
So I was only writing to you. I wasn't writing to "Clo" and don't know her. She may be wise, and generous and kind. But I don't know her and I haven't yet read anything sufficiently interesting and "out of the box" from her to form a fair opinion.
I thought your introduction to the site was well written enough to take the chance on posting something contrary here regarding Covid. Covid and the "vaccine" safety corruption/tragedy is going to continue to roll out, I expect. To some extent, we will never know all the facts -- too much money and power is at stake. It was a vast experiment, with the odds vastly against it. And, yes, I am technically qualified enough on biochemistry to say that much.
Anyway, I think it is possible, and maybe more than possible, that you and I might have some intriguing conversations and possibly even build up some manner of friendship in time (to whatever extent that is actually possible or wise, over the internet).
Most of what you have stated, in terms of assumptions about me or what I believe or what direction I might lean on a particular issue, has been completely wrong so far. Eventually you will guess more accurately, but hopefully never so perfectly that I become boring!:-)
| 