« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Hilarious: Climate Change Radicals (Video on impossibility of converting to renewables to run the planet) 

By: Zimbler0 in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (2)
Sat, 22 Oct 22 2:29 AM | 29 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 36711 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 36695 by Fiz)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Fiz > I don't know what to do. And, at the same time, I am upset with myself that I am not trying to do SOMETHING.


I realized a long time ago that the only viable way for these United States to radically reduce our carbon emissions AND still maintain our standard of living was go go nuclear in a BIG way. And I wrote to my congress critter - that lying traitorous treasonous skank elaine luria - telling her how we should do it. It was not done.

I could go on about this subject.

And, the kick in the teeth is that the ones screaming the loudest that 'we must reduce our carbon emissions' are the biggest CO2 emitters. (Think the obama's flying his and her 747's.)

What to do?
Well, I planted a number of pecan trees on my property and every year I rake up and put a bunch of carbon into leaf bags for the city to collect.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Hilarious: Climate Change Radicals (Video on impossibility of converting to renewables to run the planet)
By: Fiz
in 6TH POPE
Fri, 21 Oct 22 6:29 PM
Msg. 36695 of 60008

http://peakprosperity.com/complexity-energy-x-arrogance-ignorance-a-great-disaster/

Chris Martenson has long recognized climate change (just think ecological destruction on wide scale, if that goes down easier). However, that is not his #1 concern.

This embedded video discusses the IMPOSSIBILITY of conversion to a "sustainable" electric future FROM A MINING AND METALS RESOURCES standpoint. E.g., based upon 2019 mining numbers, it would take THOUSANDS of years of mining certain metals to be able to build enough cars, alone, much less generate and transmit sufficient power on the grid.


I'd never heard the argument approached that way, from such as simple but practical (hard to refute) basis. Very sobering.

Personally, I continue to think energy is THE penultimate issue. Ecosystem is a vital second, but if we have to decend to nuclear war to settle the issues of insufficient oil and other energy, I'm not sure 'ecosystem' concerns matter too much to many of us.

But this is very sobering. Even with a dramatically lower population of humans, how can things possibly work out? By that I mean, mostly, that the metals required for current PV panels and electric batteries seem to REQUIRE a global supply chain to get the required metals to build ANYTHING sustainable.... And that implies billions of people still living on the earth to do all that mining and transport of the seldom-considered inputs.

I don't know what to do. And, at the same time, I am upset with myself that I am not trying to do SOMETHING.


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next