The movie seems ... SEEMS ... to veer off course in the middle of part 1: going back to the 1970s and even 1960s. By the end of part 1, however, it comes back to Bill Gates and it is clearer why the deep dive into the past was important.
If even 1/10th...even 1/100th...of this is approximately true, IMO, it makes clear there are more criminals in our government than we can possibly imagine.
What should be telling is that although Robert Kennedy Jr.'s book has been out of the better part of a year, and they had to know this film was going to make that vastly more acceptable, the book and the film still exist. If even 1/10th....even 1/100th of this was false, Gates /Faucci, at least, would have had no problem suing to shut this down. But - tellingly - that hasn't happened.
Also, I don't think Robert Mallone would have been as central involved in the back story if he - Mallone - didn't think the bulk of this was plausible enough.
We've been "had" on a level almost beyond comprehension. I'm now on to Part 2. Quite mind boggling...even for me. Yet it makes PERFECT sense given that it is KNOWN that perhaps 4% of the population of humanity is not really human: they are psychopaths, apparently missing the parts of the brain which you and I use for compassion and decency.
You might have thought you were being too paranoid, too cynical, here on Atomic Bobs. In reality, you were - and probably still are - still being too naive.
| 