Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: North America&reshoring of the global supply chain

By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 04 Nov 22 2:52 AM | 33 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 37038 of 58621
(This msg. is a reply to 37037 by Zimbler0)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Zimbler0:

Re: “You can get away with calling cigarette smoke toxic. . . But not 'highly toxic'.”I don't know about that. I don't see anything in that definition you posted that gives a timeline.

I've heard that the tiniest particle of plutonium, inhaled, has an almost 100 percent rate of mortality. I'd say that's about as toxic as it gets - even though death may take months.

As for cigarettes... I expect they killed Nemo. But I do see your point. Most of us would say that an overdose of cyanide is more toxic than an overdose of fentanyl. But I wouldn't like my chances with either.















Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: North America&reshoring of the global supply chain
By: Zimbler0 in 6TH POPE
Fri, 04 Nov 22 2:33 AM 		Msg. 37037 of 58621

Decomposed > Needless to say, cigarette smoke IS highly toxic. But it doesn't kill quickly.

>>>
toxic: [adjective] containing or being poisonous material especially when capable of causing death or serious debilitation.
>>>

De,
You can get away with calling cigarette smoke toxic. . . But not 'highly toxic'. As you pointed out - it does not kill one quickly.

Zim.

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next