Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Re: Republicans join Democrats to advance same-sex ‘marriage’ bill

By: micro in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 17 Nov 22 6:56 PM | 28 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 37529 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 37522 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Its okay to have a differing opinion. The people in Noah's days also had their own opinion even though Noah and his family tried to tell them what GOD'Sopinion and view was..

They chose their own immorality and Noah built the ark under God's tutilege.. Then later we had the folks at Soddom and Ghmorra and Abraham and Lot both tried to tell them abouttheir evil ways that God had condemned.

Nobody listened then either. God allows people to follow their own desires even though they wind up being destructive to themselves.. He has given HIS counsel and words on many topics of our days but most aren;t listening OR do not care to listen.. So He allows them to go on about their own ways..

Their is a price and cost to pay for SIN. Every individual will one day stand before HIM and answer for their life's choices and ways.. But HE will not force anyone to obey His laws and will. He gives man free will to do what he wants even if itis contrary to HIS LAWS and directives.

So the GAY bunch and abortionists can do all this they want today. Ultimately, they will all anser to HIM for their sin and disobedience and HE is the final Judge..

It is unimaginable to me how people can be so utterly depraved and stupid at the same time...





» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Republicans join Democrats to advance same-sex ‘marriage’ bill
By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE
Thu, 17 Nov 22 5:15 PM 		Msg. 37522 of 60008

CTJ:

Re: “This is going to be very bad for the church and for private schools.”Here's a case where I suspect I disagree with most, possibly all, of the board's members.

I believe the legal benefits - and drawbacks - of marriage should all be conferred to Americans willing to form a contract with another American, and the sex of the participants should play no role. I say this despite my opinion that couples who are of the same gender make lousy parents since their children will not have appropriate exposure to both a female mother and a male father. (But this is also the case in single-parent households.) Therefore, my only objection to the new law is its use of the word "marriage." I consider marriage to be, first and foremost, a religious institution. Government nosed its way in long ago, and religions should never have stood for that. Once government got involved, it was only going to be a matter of time before government took it over... a time which is now upon us.

At this point, I think religions that oppose same-sex marriage should discontinue the use of the word "married" and replace it with "religiously unified," or "blessedly united," or "Lutheran sanctioned," or whatever. But not "marriage" since that's now a thing that queers do.

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next