« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Appeals Court Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban in 13-3 Decision 

By: micro in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Sat, 07 Jan 23 5:33 PM | 41 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 38881 of 60008
(This msg. is a reply to 38878 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

While I agree with the court that a ban for the cited reasons should have not been permitted, I personally see no reason to own a bumb stock for a semi-auto rifle simply to be able to squweeze off more rounds faster...

It may not be the equivalent of full auto but it is likely as close as ya can get or alter a bumb stock to be first or second cousin of a full auto weapoon..

I guess I do not see what one would use that for.... Other than in street gang gun fights or mass shootings..

Anyone else know of any possibilities that a bump stock would be something beneficial at more so than a semi auto rifle? I really have no clue....
TKS!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Appeals Court Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban in 13-3 Decision
By: Decomposed
in 6TH POPE
Sat, 07 Jan 23 6:36 AM
Msg. 38878 of 60008

January 6, 2023

Appeals Court Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban in 13-3 Decision

by Awr Hawkins
Breitbart.com



The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down a 13-3 decision Friday striking down the regulatory gun control that banned bump stocks under former President Donald Trump.

Reuters reported that the court intimated that actions on guns should be taken by Congress rather than the executive branch.

Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod wrote the majority opinion for the Fifth Circuit and also opined that the framers of the bump stock ban did not provide “fair warning that possession of a non-mechanical bump stock is a crime.”

Uploaded Image
Uploaded Image
On December 18, 2018, Breitbart News reported that the ATF finalized the language of its bump stock ban and gave people 90 days to hand the firearm accessories over.

Breitbart News possessed a copy of the DOJ’s summary of the ban at the time, and it stated:<
The Department of Justice is amending the regulations of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to clarify that bump-stock-type devices-meaning “bump fire” stocks, slide-fire devices, and devices with certain similar characteristics-are “machineguns” as defined by the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Gun Control Act of 1968 because such devices allow a shooter of a semiautomatic firearm to initiate a continuous firing cycle with a single pull of the trigger.
The summary says a bump stock allows the trigger of a semiautomatic firearm to reset between the firing of each round, but describes the bump stock-equipped “semiautomatic firearm” as “self-acting or self-regulating,” and therefore a “machinegun.”

A bump stock device that fits on a semi-automatic rifle to increase the firing speed at a gun store on October 5, 2017, in Salt Lake City, Utah.

WGRZ noted that the Fifth Circuit, on January 6, 2022, pointed out that the presence of a bump stock does not make a firearm meet the definition of a machine gun as the trigger continues to be pulled and reset even with a bump stock affixed to a semiautomatic firearm.

Judge Elrod noted, “A plain reading of the statutory language, paired with close consideration of the mechanics of a semi-automatic firearm, reveals that a bump stock is excluded from the technical definition of ‘machinegun’ set forth in the Gun Control Act and National Firearms Act.”

http://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/01/06/appeals-court-strikes-down-bump-stock-ban-13-3-decision/


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next